Memo - FuckBlockstream's Profile

12FgoWvTSbjaDA7dGd5EtBqYVXwJxE7oYL
Actions	718
Following	68
Followers	95
Topics following	19
Muted	1
Is Muted By	0

FuckBlockstream

voted No. 1865d

TheLegendaryTwatter

created poll 1867d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Should #BitcoinCash change the POW algo to go back to GPU based mining?

Yes.	3 votes · 0 satoshis
No.	9 votes · 0 satoshis
Unsure.	0 votes · 0 satoshis

Results Creating... Broadcasting...

1

FuckBlockstream

followed

maplesyrupsucker

1865d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

FuckBlockstream

liked · 1,696 sat 1869d

memo

1871d · memo

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Icons have been added to posts/likes/etc to indicate which chain they are on

1 / 2 8

6,251

FuckBlockstream

liked · 1,696 sat 1869d

memo

1869d · memo

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Balance is now displayed in the header

3 / 6 19

110,425

FuckBlockstream

replied 1888d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Unknown parent

👍

FuckBlockstream

1889d · memo

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Which chain is https://memo.cash/stats for

FuckBlockstream

liked · 1,696 sat 1891d

TheLegendaryTwatter

1891d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

1

1,696

FuckBlockstream

liked · 1,696 sat 1901d

Jeffrey Lebowski

replied 1901d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Jeffrey Lebowski

First BS refused to apply a blocksize increase as that would set a precedent so it instead softforked SegWit which initially had 35% support until they promised a 2MB increase with it.

Then when that wasn't catching in full, they scared people away from hardforks:

1 / 3 3

2,696

FuckBlockstream

liked · 1,696 sat 1903d

memo

replied 1903d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

TheLegendaryTwatter

Any ETA on the iOS app?

No promises. Hopefully within the next month.

4

13,696

FuckBlockstream

liked · 1,696 sat 1905d

TheLegendaryTwatter

replied 1905d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Jeffrey Lebowski

ROI of the largest LN hubs is 0.011%/year The 20 LNBIG Lightning Network nodes have processed 80k payments and collected 5.74 USD in fees in the last month. Extrapolating, thats $68.88 per year https://bit.ly/2G50frh

I earned more than that for my shitposts on memo. :D

4

11,696

FuckBlockstream

followed

Roger

1908d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

FuckBlockstream

unfollowed

Roger

1909d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

FuckBlockstream

sent

ChainXOR

· 1,696 sats 1909d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

your profile pic is the tits

FuckBlockstream

replied 1910d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

FuckBlockstream

The size was made just big enough to to where it is the cheapest way to embed data without bloating the UTXO set.

You can find more discussion here: https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/pull/41

1

666

FuckBlockstream

replied 1910d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

FuckBlockstream

The only benefit of increasing the size would be to make it even cheaper to embed data (it is already cheap enough imo). The downside is it makes it cheaper to attack/bloat the chain.

The size was made just big enough to to where it is the cheapest way to embed data without bloating the UTXO set.

1

FuckBlockstream

replied 1910d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

ChainXOR

Sure. But I see no reason not to increase OP_RETURN on BCH as well. I guess it is the miners who decide if they want to mine a huge OP_RETURN tx. Yes?

The only benefit of increasing the size would be to make it even cheaper to embed data (it is already cheap enough imo). The downside is it makes it cheaper to attack/bloat the chain.

1