What if you die or lose wallet access? There are legit uses for this re-mining of such addresses. Just don't leave them forever like that, move them every few years & you're fine.
There are no such uses. This is lunacy, theft, and fraud. The very basis of Bitcoin is holding the private key and an immutable ledger.
The main difference is that ABC will be ETH 2.0 and BSV will be capable of 1 TB blocks in the near future. Also ABC gets driven by people out for profit instead of creating a world currency
I'm willing to bet that BCH will have larger sustained blocks before BSV. As soon as Graphene is fully activated in BU and ported to ABCs XThinner, it will be an indisbutable reality.
Define "free society".
&app=desktop
People who can think for themselves and do not need a king/president to tell them what to think/do. Rules without rulers. Like crypto. I think people who want to be ruled prefer BSV ;)
Define "free society".
&app=desktop
People who can think for themselves and do not need a king/president to tell them what to think/do. Rules without rulers. Like crypto. I think people who want to be ruled prefer BSV ;)
Those people should look at network performance, and the miners involved. The BSV network doesnt look healthy, and the extreme miner centralisation should be a huge red flag.
Shills, trolls, Nazis and qtards are all welcome to use the loser sv fork for the rest of their pathetic worthless lives. Or until it dies in 3 months. Whichever is longer.
It is plain wrong to pretend Bitcoin SV is some true vision. It had nothing special to offer. It seems people just like the name. I prefer a dev team that can make Bitcoin scale
Any reason or are you just guessing?
Coingeek & Co, really need to stop making demands....
If they want any form of investors in their ideas, they need to stop acting like dick-tators.
Ayre's demand in a decentralized system & free market makes no sense. The ticker is decided by exchanges, good luck negotiating with every exchange in the world.
CoinGeek offers end to hash war in exchange for renaming BCH -> BAB:
CoinGeek is the owner of the largest sustained hash on BCH for months leading up to the November upgrade and therefore the leader of efforts to make
F*ck coingeek. The whole war was about the name in the first place as I mentioned days ago the only reason BSV did not add Replay protection. let coingeek keep losing money unitil D.
The only ticker i want for BCH is its real ticker...BTC :-)
The day will come, but first the market will have to crash much harder.
were really gonna fight cryptos using hash power with CSW being the evil guy who wants to sell patents that will make Bitcoin a permissioned bank coin. Then when they lost the war
over BCH they changed their tactics once again. nChain is the continuation of Blockstream, it's the other side of the same coin and they both were so successful at infiltrating
"The reality is that we've been attacked twice, both times by private bankrolled startups that became incredibly hostile, using the exact same social warfare tactics to try and sow discord and reap division yet again.
If CSW is satoshi and has nearly unlimited funds then he is letting ABC dig their own grave by getting their chain longer. He is committing them to battle.
He is just a fraud. He should be ignored, so we can start building and increasing adoption again.
What's next? Let me guess: TXs involved in illegal activities should be blocked by court order.
$The_BCH_Boys are right. Since ABC is the majority chain for the last 24 hours they should kill off the minority chain for the security of their users.
Why not let SV alive so CSW leaves us alone? He'll be so happy blacklisting and stealing UTXOs...
I think the problem is CSW is a Douche Bag. It's easier to ignore the White paper than a Threatening Dictating douche bag.
well that and his thoughts/arguments are not clearly presented & riddled with insults & constant reminders of how much smarter than everyone else he is. insufferable!
BitcoinSV will win this longterm
Win what? ABC already split successfully. SV can have their centralized chain while everyone else continues to support the ABC chain.
Ethereum had to differentiate from Bitcoin and ultimately is going to be a POS system. We don't need to become Ethereum 2.0, why are so many obsessed with ignoring the White Paper?
I think the problem is CSW is a Douche Bag. It's easier to ignore the White paper than a Threatening Dictating douche bag.
BitcoinSV will win this longterm
Win what? ABC already split successfully. SV can have their centralized chain while everyone else continues to support the ABC chain.
in the long run there is only one
Yes, and it's clear SV has lost what they set out to do.
