Not true one bit. Under gold, with full reserves, its possible to expand Debt multiples beyond the supply of money by simple lending.
One can expand debt, whatever the underlying asset, but the interest (when not regulated) the market is dynamically setting will price in the risk-reward with higher or lower %.
LN will never come. That's what is holding BTC up. The "HOPE". Eventually the BTC community will get tired of waiting. Especially as BCH is growing more use cases as BTC waits.
I should clearly have added a question mark instead of a dot at the "LN is coming?" ;-)
I agree, there are some problems with BTC when there are spikes and high demands. I do find BCH more attractive lately, especially the steady 0-conf and low satoshi fees. LN is coming.
LN will never come. That's what is holding BTC up. The "HOPE". Eventually the BTC community will get tired of waiting. Especially as BCH is growing more use cases as BTC waits.
a huge increase (decrease) of the kind we have seen hundreds of times in crypto. point is BTC isn't being able to function smoothly given its own normal fluctuations.
I agree, there are some problems with BTC when there are spikes and high demands. I do find BCH more attractive lately, especially the steady 0-conf and low satoshi fees. LN is coming.
Debt in and of itself is not evil, but it will not be as easily conjured in a hard money system for two reasons: (1) no more bailouts and (2) relative deflation.
Doesn't matter what type money it is. Once you loan it out, it becomes debt. That money can then be reloaned again, making more debt. Please read the article posted.
A correction, it is not possible to do do fractional reserve lending with Bitcoin as in lending out more Bitcoin directly than you have. You need to give IOUs with Bitcoin as reserve.
Banker's will weld bitcoin just as strongly as fiat. Bitcoin once loaned, becomes debt money. It makes no difference.
Bitcoin becomes the underlying asset which the debt can be settled or forgiven, but the Bitcoin itself is independent on any debt begin created or repaid/forgiven/defaulted.
Not being able to have daddy Federal Reserve print you money when you fail may make banks more responsible when using bitcoin. That might make them not too quick to adopt it.
Also, if they lent out Bitcoin directly, not as a basis for their reserves, it would be impossible for them to do fractional reserve banking. Would require an extremely low deafult rat
How can we make CoinText more secure regarding the protection of the private key? If I understand correctly, one simple leak of the software can generate the private key for all phone numbers.
Please, if you misconstrue my post as criticism that's your misconception.
My praise lives as utility, I'm preparing for a BCH first birthday party
and txstreet is the star of the show
I didn't see your opinion as criticism, I was just responding like we were having a normal conversation. I hope to see more of you and do update us on that BCH birthday party!
tested it, the 'people' walk out of the yours house not saying anything :(
I am sure it will be improved over time, at least there is progress with https://txstreet.com/. All praise to the creative teams & individuals who devote their time to these things.
There is a difference, to me at least in being paid $4 per hour for full time (40 hr wk) and $7+/hr. Companies that don't pay enough to support standard of living will encounter friction.
Like if I were to take some wood and make a guitar out of it. Take 500m sats of material and then sell that+creativity for 1bch - I've increased the money value of BCH by that much.