If bsv community expel csw and ca, I will consider buy some bsv for playing.
Disagree. I'm a BSV supporter, and I want to see if Bitcoin 0.1 can scale. We've tried literally everything else, but not the original protocol.
Assume the network capacity, CPU, RAM, SSD increase by 10x, every protocol(including ETH LTC XRP) scales. But BCH will scale much faster by using techs like CTOR,Graphene,preconsensus.
Call it Turing or whatever you want.A simple, flexible, and predictable sound money is what is needed. Don't gamble with the best currency in existence. It is noone's code playground.
So SV and ABC have totally different paths. Just let them fork, the weaker lose, thats the nature of bitcoin. Forks happens with ABC, each fork makes bitcoin better. with BSV, no fork.
Seriously, the debate create a lot of TXs in memo, so i suggest memo should follow the chain able to create more debates in the future, the chain with more Dev teams.
You apparently don't even know why BTC is broken, and why CSW is making sure that doesn't happen again. Shameful.
No you're right. I've absolutely no idea what csw have contributed to Bitcoin except for a shit ton of talk&promises and of course he's endless patents (very Satoshi like btw)
I am not suggesting nither FOMO3D nor 1min block, I am just try to explain BCH is not Turing complete and with Turing complete doesn't mean it can do everything.
So, the arguments for whether BCH is Turing complete have no sense. BCH need more function and scalbility to gain more users, a fixed protocal doesn't help, that's all.
Haha and you can win Fomo3D on Ethereum using Blockstuffing. Only on Ethereum with small congested blocks.
Seriously, are you suggesting we need 1 min blocks on BCH to play FOMO3D?
I am not suggesting nither FOMO3D nor 1min block, I am just try to explain BCH is not Turing complete and with Turing complete doesn't mean it can do everything.
If v0.1 of bitcoin is Turing complete, going back to v0.1 is not crippling bitcoin, it is just keeping it simple (yet complete). Incomparable to what CORE did.
No one proved bitcoin is Turing complete including csw's white paper, and Turing complete doesn't mean it can do anything. For example, you cannot run FOMO3D on BCH.
I read it, briefly. Check out WallStreetTechnologist's reply pointing out that introduction of this new opcode jeopardizes the long term viability of $bitcoin's business use.
Most OP_CODEs in bitcoin used rarely, because of the bitcoin CORE, they disabled bitcoin. Now nChain want to lock the bitcoin protocol to v0.1, that is just like the CORE
Sorry, but saying that it will bring Oracle into BCH is insufficient. You should provide code examples, etc. I would rather have a 10-OP Forth than a 1000 OP Cobol to work with.
"COOL"? You need more than cool, there is only 10 OP_'s left in the protocol. I'd rather have it future proof than COOL!
It bring Oracle into BCH, "there is only 10 OP_'s left in the protocol", wrong, there is no limit on OP_'s, just use another byte when more OPs are needed.
who would you rather put your faith in?
| Roger Ver - Evangelist |
11 votes
(11 unique)
· 564 satoshis
|
| Craig Wright - Personality |
5 votes
(4 unique)
· 0 satoshis
|
| Jihan Wu - Miner |
5 votes
(4 unique)
· 0 satoshis
|
| Amaury Sechet - Developer |
3 votes
(2 unique)
· 0 satoshis
|
| Other |
5 votes
(5 unique)
· 0 satoshis
|
Results
Creating...
Broadcasting...
Which side do you support with the coming November Hard Fork?
Bitcoin ABC plans canonical transaction ordering, activation for OP_CHECKDATASIG and OP_CHECKDATASIGVERIFY.
nChain plans block size to 128MB.
| Bitcoin ABC with Amaury Sechet |
11 votes
· 0 satoshis
|
| nChain with CSW |
18 votes
· 7,676 satoshis
|
| I don't care. |
5 votes
· 1,000 satoshis
|
Results
Creating...
Broadcasting...
Memo has reached 10,000 on-chain transactions!
