Your argument dismantles itself, because then you could say we definitely don't need CTOR because it's just premature optimization not needed yet.
When did I make an argument? Or even mention CTOR? Im just asking a question, and pointing out the obvious.
won't have negative affects when a transaction A who sends to transaction B in the same block but B is sorted above A in the order due to txid. It could scupper future innovation 🤓
No one has proven to me that it could have negative effects. From my understanding, this makes no difference in the network as a whole, but will require changes to many services.
Bitcoin SV Roadmap.
https://bitcoinsv.io/roadmap/
ABC creates the problems then pushes shit like CTOR which does nothing to fix issues.
Nothing on there addresses the bottlenecks we saw during the last few stress tests. Why bump up block size to 128 MB (or at all) when it's clear we can't safely make 32 MB blocks yet?
Only months before a hardfork with changes that had been scheduled and discussed more than a year in advance.
They even worked with CSW until a few months ago, when he decided he was no longer going to work with anyone in the community, and instead declare new rule changes and a new road map for BCH...
To answer your question, I take ABC seriously because they have a long and consistent history of working with the community to develop protocol changes in a responsible manner.
We will see. This hash power CSW claims to have is still yet to materialize... Is it all currently mining BTC, or is it offline? If it is offline, why? If on BTC, where (what pool, etc)?
People who take it seriously are so misinformed that they are hopeless to talk about on any real issue.
Says the Illuminati Lizard-Man... How much is George Soros paying your race???
Check CSW’s tweets. I’m ok with it. I’d like BCH to absorb XRP market cap.
So that's a no? The only thing I can see that makes SV "bank friendly" is the fact that DSV (new ABC rules) is very bank unfriendly...
it is clear that these guy have developed enough support (both from the community and $) that it would be foolish not to take them and their ideas seriously.
The reason I'm taking them seriously is simply because most others are. Calvin / CSW has been all talk so far - I mean, ffs, BU beat them to even implementing their new ruleset. BUT...
road map, which makes a whole lot of sense and was the community consensus until a few months ago. SV's road map is unclear, other than "scaling now!"
Ignoring all the characters, and looking only at the proposed changes for the upcoming fork, it is difficult for me to make a decision. On the other hand, the changes fit into ABC's detailed...
It all comes down to block size, and the fact that the network and software is not optimized to handle even full 32 MB blocks. This is the bottleneck. See stress tests if you don't believe me.
Lol what? First of all, you need a warehouse full of Antminers to have a chance at mining a block... Raspberry Pis are not the scaling bottleneck... The software is.
BU 1.5.0.1 released with SV rule-set implemented. I know my little non-mining node is pretty meaningless, but I'm still torn as to what rule set to enable before Nov. 15... Read everything and it's still unclear.
This "hash war" will at the very least be entertaining: Will CSW move/use Satoshis coins, will nChain & crew successfully attack the "ABC chain", will BITMAIN be able to step in and fight back? Get your popcorn ready.
hah. Was worth getting banned from /r/btc if I made it to the Twitter feed of The BCH Boys :D
Lol, but you made up 25% of the posts on r/btc... What will you do with your life now that you aren't supplying Reddit with hourly updates and minute-by-minute commentary on BCH?
I'm Jim.
You should checkout: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9ubtbr/confessions_of_a_shill_in_response_to_post_jimbtc/
Full cryptographic proof there ;)
Dude you have way to much time on your hands. Spend some of that energy building something... or doing SOMETHING productive. That has to be the most pointless shit I ever read.
Is there a page somewhere (or does someone want to build a bot) that watches for Satoshi’s BTC and more importantly BCH to move?
If this fork turns ugly in November BCH will be overpriced at $500
This fork is already ugly - people on all sides have their shit in their hand and are taking aim at the fan.
SV hash growing. Looks like Calvin and Craig will force BITMAIN and other Chinese miners to make a move. Interested to see if Craig has 1mil BTC/BCH, and how far BITMAIN is willing to go to protect their 1mil BCH.
Am I the only one who thinks this feels eerily like mid 2016 all over again?
There could be a PR risk if the mainstream media ever discovered it and understood it's potential. Till then it's our little BCH free speech paradise.
Yeah, I take that back, that's actually very true. There definitely is some risk.
