SV supporters are on every thread to explain why those reorgs are healthy. That's funny
So you think you can replace the internet without any 6-reorgs?
#metanet
The Internet routes around censorship.
The free market routes around taxation (= theft).
Because theft is to free trade like censorship is to free speech.
No txs are lost during re orgs
SV supporters are on every thread to explain why those reorgs are healthy. That's funny
lol
I think it is. If they are only ~8miners you can't double spend even if the chain split. And if it's fine from the user perspective .. But I agree it's really weird, but interesting !
Ha! That’s one hell of a feature 😂
😂😂😂😂
Answers from the thread :
"No transactions has been lost"
"I was splitting coins while this happened. All still worked just fine from the end user's perspective"
It's ok, don't worry
"It's a feature. Not a bug"
"No transactions has been lost"
"I was splitting coins while this happened. All still worked just fine from the end user's perspective"
Ha! That’s one hell of a feature 😂
"It's a feature. Not a bug"
"No transactions has been lost"
"I was splitting coins while this happened. All still worked just fine from the end user's perspective"
Bitcoin Cash Launches Notary Service
https://cryptobriefing.com/bitcoin-cash-notary-service/
I think bch should focus on p2p cash and let BSV do these things. But that's cool !
Exactly. Don’t you have to exchange your btc for L-btc? Liquid btc? After majority btc are exchanged it will be time to increase the 21 million limit. Just like printing fiat system.
For LiquidBTC that is correct. You have to trust they (the 23 (I think) exchanges responsible of Liquid) won't scam you. It isn't correct for LN because the cryptography can't scam you
Lightning BTC are real BTC. Liquid BTC aren't. The whole point of Liquid is what you said. It isn't true for the LN
I'm paid to be an sv shill, not to be anti btc
Lowering the cap isn't that dump I think but even if they propose an increase of the 21 limit it won't be accepted I think (and they would have to hard fork maybe)
"Its unclear that all of Lightning's theoretical additional layers are inflation proof. Lightning's biggest problem is lack of liquidity. Easily solved by printing money on demand. Don't say you weren't warned."
What do you mean ? You can't add inflation on LN because it's linked to the main chain and everyone has the whole blockchain to verify that
BCH is currently moving more value per day than the next two coins (ETH & LTC) combined and is in #2 overall (behind BTC)
For eth, is it only the eth moved or also the tokens/DApps ?
Answering an "😂" is not the same thing as adding the "😂" reaction. But yeah you can implement it without changing the protocol
Suggestion: built in smiley (or emoji, whatever) selector
This is protocol change and not just an UX change. I don't think memo should change it's protocol too often
