Jeffrey Lebowski

Joined Apr 26, 2018

The United States is a nation of laws: badly written and randomly enforced.

Mute
14QV68d4bsuWNjWJS5B9dAMSP1ueqPMQHg
Actions 3,636
Following 62
Followers 161
Topics following 14
Muted 0
Is Muted By 0

replied 2322d
cbeastsv
Then why do you feel the need to spew your endless SV shilling and fear mongering here, if it doesn't matter?
replied 2322d
cbeastsv
I am not afraid, but if it is possible to undermine BCH (or BSV) because of two ignorant blown up egos owning a patent trolling company, it was doomed to fail anyway.
2324d · Bitcoin Cash
Calvin Ayre runs a casino where he milks degenerates aka gamblers. WTF is he yapping about #BCH?
2322d · Bitcoin Cash
Can't wait for the day the sv coin dies and all their loser shills can finally shut the fuck up.
replied 2323d
BitcoinHoarder
Failed? Besides, achieving a 64 MB block that takes 40 mins to propagate and NO increase on sustained throughput is not really that impressive. Watch when CTOR comes into effect ;-)
Mrpumperitis
replied 2325d
Mrpumperitis
The only ticker i want for BCH is its real ticker...BTC :-)
replied 2325d
F*ck coingeek. The whole war was about the name in the first place as I mentioned days ago the only reason BSV did not add Replay protection. let coingeek keep losing money unitil D.
replied 2333d
Memes are for Coretards.
Satoshi
2334d · Bitcoin Cash
For Bitcoin Cash to be accepted by Amazon worldwide, feel free to send mail to Jeff Bezos - jeff@amazon.com.
replied 2334d
If the mempools stay consistent across nodes, then any bloom filter based lookup would still work, but orphan rates might be worse than if we have graphene **with** CTOR.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2335d
Mrpumperitis
These are shorts. People are borrowing money to bet that the price will go down. A well hung whale could easily make a million dollars by popping stops and liquidating them.
Barricade
replied 2335d
Hash war over? It has not started yet.
replied 2335d
🤖 1 BCH = 555.53$ 📉 -1.01%
Tips = fuel️
#BCHprice
replied 2335d
That is great news, he is very valuable to the community IMHO. He articulates his points and his stance clearly and without mincing words.
2335d · Bitcoin Cash
historically war has been a mayor cause for invention; we shall see if the same applies to hashwars 👌👏
2336d · Bitcoin Cash
SV is obviously the takeover attack. Not sure how anyone can see that this isn't an attack. As it is Blickstream devs support SV.
2336d · Bitcoin Cash
This is an attack by SV (Blockstream)
replied 2336d
Yes, and they will get that with ABC along with the neccesseary optimizations to achieve gigabyte blocks. SV offers no concrete info on how they will fix the bottlenecks.
replied 2336d
Take a look at this. This is ABC and BU dev meeting/discussion. No technobabble. Real stuff. https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9voqg1/not_sure_who_to_support_in_the_upcoming_fork/
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2336d
How do you think those businesses will react when the blocks start crapping out anytime they reach 22mb? Bad experience=bad business. Issues need to be resolved while there is less tx.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2336d
Oh really? For some reason I thought the next upgrade was in May 2019 🤔
That’s even better then ☺️
replied 2336d
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
Actually it would only be 4 months because the next upgrade would be March.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2336d
If the system craps out at 22mb because of bottleneck issues then increasing to 128 doesn’t resolve that. Fix the bottleneck then increase to 128 in 6 months is logical & safe.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2336d
Sk8eM dUb
“Orphan rate moons”
You don’t see this as being a priority issue that should be resolved before increasing the blocksize well beyond what is needed right now?
replied 2336d
BitcoinHoarder
No, that is certainly NOT true at all. Both ABC and BU has larger blocksize (up to 1 Terabyte) as a goal. But first the software must be able to handle it.