"The narrative which accuses BCH of "stealing the Bitcoin name" is one of the stupidest most misleading out there. Every holder of BTC received the same amount of coins in the new ledger, the only question is which
Case-study: Peter Todd acted unethically during the Antbleed crisis. He spread false information, which he refused to retract or correct. To this day, he still hasn't apologized for his unethical behavior.
The cons of BTC are: 1 In order to use LN, you must at least open a channel which can incur a large start up fee. 2 You must securely manage a node which involves having a hot wallet with API access, or hire this
Litecoin was a scam from the start: "The first 10000 blocks of Litecoin were mined in a bit over 23 hours. 576 should've been mined in one day according to officially communicated blocktime of 2.5 minutes.
The thing I like most about Memo is that it makes the trolls face the dilemma of letting discussion go uninterrupted here or increase the usage of BCH.
"Don´t just shuffle once, shuffle shuffle shuffle, it costs far less than a cent to shuffle your coins. Maybe I´m in the wrong time zone right now, but there is space for improvement here in the shuffle pools."
Blockstream patent on Liquid Network tech: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20160330034A1/ There is a conflict of interest between Blockstream's business model and bitcoin becoming sound, global money.
"They have no intention of Individuals using LN. Their (not publicly stated) plan is for large financial institutions to form hubs and use LN for intraday trading before paying $1000+ fees to settle on the BTC network
"I don't trust this market uptick, reminds me of the time willybot was buying up all the Bitcoin on Mtgox. I think we might hit as high as 10 000 USD for BTC and then a massive 80% crash. "
It is just a fact that USDT is the bulk of the market, which means most of the market is subject to a centralized counterfeit fiat created by an international cartel led by Bitfinex. Most of this space is in fact