I see a future for ETH. None of the actual tokens are required for what they do but some tokens like BAT could have real demand and still be around for years. Coins like NANO and ZIL
with new approach to blockchain could also have value in the future but it's too early to tell if they'll develop to anything (that's why it's called speculation).
Which non-Bitcoin coins do you support or highly esteem?
I see a future for ETH. None of the actual tokens are required for what they do but some tokens like BAT could have real demand and still be around for years. Coins like NANO and ZIL
Which non-Bitcoin coins do you support or highly esteem?
"What's the point in a blockchain which is mined by a single central authority? Bsv may be superficially a crypto but it's not a crypto at all in practice. Even if the testnet nodes were in remote parts of the world
the 1G blocks don't mean a thing since the whole point of crypto is to be Byzantine fault tolerant, not just pass blocks around fast."
"What's the point in a blockchain which is mined by a single central authority? Bsv may be superficially a crypto but it's not a crypto at all in practice. Even if the testnet nodes were in remote parts of the world
Core's goal isn't to make money but to stop p2p cash. The team may be doing a killing while at it, but that has nothing to do with what their job requires them to do.
Of course that is true for BCH supporters, but, I even believe most of the real humans that own, mine and develop BTC agree lower fees, 2MB blocks and being able to buy coffee with BTC
would be good things for BTC. If I am right, the deception that BTC has a large base of real human's who agree with Core policies is still in place and is believed by most people.
LN is not intended to fix scaling for the people of the world
The real community never wanted high fees small blocks and the loss of BTC's primary use case. They still do not want that
Of course that is true for BCH supporters, but, I even believe most of the real humans that own, mine and develop BTC agree lower fees, 2MB blocks and being able to buy coffee with BTC
the ticker (brand) and adoption we had spent years building.
Later we found out the loss of the primary use case of Core's BTC (p2p cash for the world) was intentional and permanent.
LN is not intended to fix scaling for the people of the world
The real community never wanted high fees small blocks and the loss of BTC's primary use case. They still do not want that
LN to provide scaling (for the primary use case of Bitcoin - p2p cash for the world). The real BTC community fell for the lie, believed they were a minority and gave up the fight for
the ticker (brand) and adoption we had spent years building.
Later we found out the loss of the primary use case of Core's BTC (p2p cash for the world) was intentional and permanent.
How s2x fail if it had 95% signaling?
An army of liars pretended they were the BTC community throughout social media. They claimed the community supported high fees, small blocks and a short delay until the arrival of
LN to provide scaling (for the primary use case of Bitcoin - p2p cash for the world). The real BTC community fell for the lie, believed they were a minority and gave up the fight for
How s2x fail if it had 95% signaling?
An army of liars pretended they were the BTC community throughout social media. They claimed the community supported high fees, small blocks and a short delay until the arrival of
BCH may have labor pains but at least it doesn't try to cripple itself like BTC does.
Memo is more fun than the rest of social sites...I spend my most of the time in memo. I an very grateful to the memo community for this.
Other social media doesn't have tips.
ABC Bug Explained:
it felt good to hit the attackers back,” having pruned their addresses of funds used to act maliciously toward the BCH community. Here’s how he did it.
media coverage. After developers heroically patched a fix, Calin Culianu noticed the attacker(s) left themselves wide open. He went from being frustrated to telling CoinSpice, “Damn,
it felt good to hit the attackers back,” having pruned their addresses of funds used to act maliciously toward the BCH community. Here’s how he did it.
TL;DR: No one in the crypto ecosystem will ever say 15 May 2019 was boring. Mere minutes into the scheduled Bitcoin Cash (BCH) network upgrade, an unrelated bug was found, timed to be exploited for maximum negative
media coverage. After developers heroically patched a fix, Calin Culianu noticed the attacker(s) left themselves wide open. He went from being frustrated to telling CoinSpice, “Damn,
TL;DR: No one in the crypto ecosystem will ever say 15 May 2019 was boring. Mere minutes into the scheduled Bitcoin Cash (BCH) network upgrade, an unrelated bug was found, timed to be exploited for maximum negative
"The attack was supposed to make everyone think hard forks are dangerous. The fact that we're on the other side of this even with a bug makes me feel hard forks are less dangerous because even when "something goes
wrong" it can be fixed. Not to lull ourselves into a false sense of security..thats not the point. The point is their scare tactic is less effective."
