Beggars are people. In some cases they have been traumatized into mental states simply dysfunctional. Helping them helps everyone eventually, but only if help is a transaction and not just a donation
That is very true, and I don't give a shit what you support or not, I can see you don't know real history or what is what, I can see you are very brainwashed.
It is wrong to judge a persons intelligence by how much they agree with you. You have no idea what things you "know" are wrong, and which are true.
Beggars: those who beg either (1.) do not understand to offer their service(s) in return for cash or (2.) are just being lazy. SOLUTION= offer BCH for activity paid upon verification. TRANSACT !
Memo needs an edit feature or at least I need one badly. Could it work by "overriding" the existing memo, sending a new memo with the existing posts ID and the site displays the most recent?
RBF ? ( that did not end well...) Hahahaha this is the best humour of the morning - thanks (Yes, I still owe you a gif of the app)
Introducing hivr app (rebranded Unit wallet), the ..
http://redd.it/8za7lv
MEMO.CASH does not request an email address to sign up [see http://hivr.cash/ "PRIVACY"]. MEMO.CASH is eventually open source. Even an ordinary web browser can pilot MEMO.CASH.
Please recommend a hosting provider for a BCH node ? https://lowendbox.com/ shovels an enormous amount of information but sifting through who might offers a crypto-paid KVM + DEBIAN solution hurts
It sucks hard if they haven't resolved this by now... I don't think they have... They should just introduce a minimal fee for publishing new articles (10 cents or less) - to stop spam
No one really knows what precisely 'the problem" actually is, which indicates the problem may be something in a completely different universe from what we think it is.
It sucks hard if they haven't resolved this by now... I don't think they have... They should just introduce a minimal fee for publishing new articles (10 cents or less) - to stop spam
This seems a collision between different commitments and the difficulty of the "problem". This is why open-source projects have a distinct advantage - people can suggest solutions.
If you cannot decide what is harmful, then you cannot use "the one law". What are you to do then? Also, sometimes (or should I say always) all choices, even non-action choice, will harm someone
I await a comprehensive definition of how 'non-action' can Harm Beings.