I suggest making a chess game between two groups in which every user has a vote for the next move and the move with most votes is played.
Players who voted for the move that wins receive a higher weighted vote for the next more: The only way I could ever get the group dynamics to work in my head for extended strategies.
In the same way BCH splitting from the old chain is the natural reaction to a centralized authority censorship attempt on the blockchain - BCH is merely routing around Blockstream.
Hello, I work on things like chainfeed, datacash, readcash, and @_opreturn Twitter bot. Doing a chat later today, feel free to drop by if you like any of these!
5. Were it up to miners and me, all of my transactions would be on-chain. This is why Bitcoin had to fork into Bitcoin Cash, so that the validators of my transactions are the ones with the correct economic incentives.
4. These regulator-nodes also think they determine which transactions are worthy to be included in the blockchain and which are "spam". You must hope your use is deemed worthy enough for their unnecessary validation.
3. Then, these non-mining nodes turn around and complain about their costs. They even want to throttle businesses, users, and use-cases to make sure their unnecessary, unwanted "services" don't get too expensive.
2. Non-mining nodes claim to protect me from businesses that I want to patronize. I am not scared of miners, and I do not want NMN to "verify" transactions on my behalf. They have no economic incentive to do so.
1. Non-mining nodes have turned into unwanted third-party regulators, getting between me and miners. They think of themselves as protectors of the network, but they've actually ruined the experience for most users.
99.99% of users will not learn how to code in order to use Bitcoin. BTC might capture the 0.01% of insular techies with time on their hands, but BCH can capture the rest of the global market for p2p electronic cash.