"Bitcoin isn't currently practical for very small micropayments. Not for things like pay per search or per page view without an aggregating mechanism" - Satoshi Nakamoto
That aggregating mechanism is LN my friends.
Actually, scratch that. According to coin.dance it is currenlty 3.30% more profitable to mine on BSV compared to BTC. BCH lies at 1.70%, making BSV mining the most profitable.
Seems ridiculous to me that we treat block size changes as major design decisions. Monero has had dynamic block sizes for years and it actually works great
I believe that Monero tries to achieve fundamentally different goals than Bitcoin. But out of curiosity: What is the highest available / confirmed dynamic block size?
If I am not mistaken that BSV sits at 128mb currently, one could argue that, putting future plans aside, BSV leads the scaling game so far and offers something ABC still has to prove.
I am not informed on whether or not some information I read on the internet is indeed accurate, that's why I ask. I want to compare current verifiable capabilities of BCHABC vs BCHSV.