Disagree. I'm a BSV supporter, and I want to see if Bitcoin 0.1 can scale. We've tried literally everything else, but not the original protocol.
yep. CSW and Calvin Ayre are probably selling their BCH which is what is putting pressure on the price.
Probably also Jihan as his IPO is going down the drain. So he needs someone to drop his bags on.
No rulers does not mean no rules. If we stop obeying the mafia, the mafia will disappear. However, if you are so obsessed with being ruled, you can also be governed voluntarily
Hahah nooo, if you stop obeying the mafia - they KILL you.
I'll follow the white paper before I follow a dev or a crowd. I understand the original design of Bitcoin. I don't understand how "Bitcoin" Cash BCH works.
Anyone on SV side want to chip in a small amount of Satoshis my way so I can keep pissing Roger Ver Minions off? Otherwise I'm broke for a few days until I travel to a Bitcoin ATM.
#BitcoinSV #BSV #nChain #CoinGeek
It's because more users are starting to use BCH after they have split off (and sold) BSV. At least that is the case for me :)
Hell no we sold abc 3.3 ratio some did better.. so BSV holders who sold BAB.. have 3 to 4 times the coin and has gone up in value 😎
Again Sam. RETARDED.
&t=1s
meeting @memo's Jason,
a highlight of the conference.
Putting faces to names
and hearing the direction of this platform
THANK YOU :)
I am Jihan. Hello Memo!
Hardware wallet? You can use an old cell phone without a SIM card.
People who can think for themselves and do not need a king/president to tell them what to think/do. Rules without rulers. Like crypto. I think people who want to be ruled prefer BSV ;)
And if Roger or Aumary do something you don't like with ABC what will you do?
I decide what to do with my money and when. Bitcoin makes erasing my money from the ledger almost impossible. Changing that on some chains of Bitcoin will just make them less valuable
What if you die or lose wallet access? There are legit uses for this re-mining of such addresses. Just don't leave them forever like that, move them every few years & you're fine.
I fucked up so bad supporting Amaury. I should have supported Satoshi exclusively
SEC Chairman: Blockchain is powerful "but you need to follow our securities laws"
SEC Chairman Jay Clayton chatted with me about those who try to skirt securities regulations.
That's great but most people aren't going to buy $100 of Bitcoin(and pay a 5-10% fee) just to buy something on Amazon. purse.io is for holders and that means exposure to RISK
Not a chicken and egg problem at all. The blocksize is not what businesses look at when considering accepting Bitcoin. Adoption first increase the blocksize as needed.
Let me repeat, there will be NO massive adoption of Bitcoin as money until the price swings are within a small range year to year. It will be a commodity ledger first, or it will die.
Where? Where did he talk about this?
on twitter. He released a statement. Go and follow ryan x charles and money button and you won't have to scroll down far. None of the SV crowd use reddit anymore. r/btc is all ABC now
You do not accept a new agreement on the basis that "I cannot see at the moment that there is power behind it to enforce it", you accept a new agreement if it is a good agreement.
So for VISA level of txs per second (1000200txs/block), CTOR will cut down about 2.2MB of ordering info from graphene if I get this right.
Why does it feel like this chat discussion here is >50% about SV these days? And why is it almost exclusively bashing BCH instead of being productive?
Stiff. If you're looking for an echo chamber, there's always /r/btc
