Anarchists seem to prefer BCH, while statists of many regards prefer BTC. Tells me where I belong, but I also fear that anarchists always stay in a niche rather than really changing things. How do we spread the fire?
Hello, people!
My name is Fabiola Gamboa, I am 23 years old from South America, I have a child, his name is Lyam, I like to cook and photography, I am interested in cryptocurrency.
Hi Fabiola! Welcome to Memo! I keep hearing stories about how cryptocurrency is saving the day in Venezuela. Where are you in South America? Growing a crypto community?
Next in my shitcoin series: IOTA
What if its not real the goal but a way to force a free floating real time market, by taking away the crunch ( on a small # per TX) could that be like taking the training wheels off?
Perhaps. My fear is that 0-fee protocol that isn't adopted by all nodes will cause a much larger probability for double-spends. If there's a way around those concerns, I'm supportive.
This is how its done, easy how to videos. great job.
Thank you, Jerry!
"to send cryptocurrency to a no-coiner" haha I like it :D
Thank you!
Made a how-to video about CoinText:
Betrayed by my own family members who think I'm some kind of a villain. I've never been so hurt in my life by the actions of people that I loved and trusted. Only grateful for my AWESOME wife for standing by my side.
the 0-fee news floating around lately just seems like a talking point against EOS
Been saying for years that these "free" txn blockchains are BS. Compromising security for free txns when a transaction can be secured for under a penny is ridiculous. Iota, EOS, Nano.
0-conf all the way. 0-fee is something we could consider but not a must have. Let me put this way: 0-conf is a must have, 0-fee is a nice to have.
I actually think 0-fee is silly and unnecessary. 0-conf is critical.
I don't know if we can do both technically. Need to research more. I don't think we need zero fee. Maybe if BCH is more valuable then *lower* but I'm not sure it should ever be 0.
I think 0-fee is completely unnecessary. 0-conf is critical.
What's more important for UX on BCH?
0-Conf
I think 0-conf matters and 0 fee is unnecessary. Fees are nominal on BCH, but the 0-conf UX is priceless.
What's more important for UX on BCH?
| 0-Conf |
20 votes
· 12,000 satoshis
|
| 0-Fee |
1 votes
· 0 satoshis
|
| We can do both |
9 votes
· 1,000 satoshis
|
Results
Creating...
Broadcasting...
Received a BTC payment to a legacy address. 30 min later, no conf. Spent it unconfirmed to a Segwit address & it had 1 conf in 3 mins. How can I spend 0-conf BTC that hasn't been mined? Should I double spend attempt?
Also, 0-conf is a unique selling point to merchant adoption that must be preserved. I'm not sure how it would hurt 0-conf, I still have to look into it.
I agree that keeping 0-conf is more important than 0-fee. UX is what will win, and people care more about speed than a microscopic fee.
I think, we could allow free txs if we can all agree on a specific age the coins need to have before the free tx is relayed.
I agree. It worked on Bitcoin until 2013-2014. But maybe the level of traffic would be problematic. i.e. SPAM
Haha. Would like to hear your opinion 😉
I'm not fully convinced BTC will go to zero. Lots of stupid things retain value for stupid reasons. Bitcoin Core could be one of those things.
Vin Armani fighting with CSW about the potential problems with zero fee txns making spam easier and hurting 0-conf. Any thoughts on this?
This guy adds microtransactions which give incentive to mine, which adds security to the network. Thanks for paying to secure BCH.
I would like to get your view about: Einstenium, Funfair, NEM and Hempcoin... all coins that I am wondering if it is better to dump and get some nice BCH until is cheap
Shitcoins can be good to trade! Dump them near upward resistance zones, and buy BCH when it's near lower support zones.
I'm going to start a shitcoin series. Starting with XVG:
What would you like to see covered next?
