You assume all the time, which explains why you don't know a fucking thing. If you really knew Physics the way you claim you would know that its not possible for the towers to collapse like that
Which side do you support with the coming November Hard Fork?
Bitcoin ABC plans canonical transaction ordering, activation for OP_CHECKDATASIG and OP_CHECKDATASIGVERIFY.
nChain plans block size to 128MB.
We have created entirely new DNA from scratch ourselves. That is beside the point though. Evolution would be disprove if DNA could just create whole new complex chains in one go.
If evolution would be a slow process we should witness as of RIGHT NOW mid-organs with no functions. There is not a single instance in the whole world showing that.
StresstTestDay, Saturday1September
Testing to find bitcoincash limits
Aim is 5 million txns in 24hrs
Aug1 testing scripts saw 670k txns easily
Stressed memo, bitcoin.com & cointext :)
We want to see what happens when BCH is 'stressed' What happens To fees? (they dropped Aug1) To the mempool? With miners, who will be the first to mine over 8mb?
Banks conspiring with governments to either destroy or subdue it is not a "conspiracy theory", but "conspiracy practice". To think otherwise would be illogical, irrational and naive.
Adam Back (2015) (before he was Blockstream CEO): "My suggestion 2MB now, then 4MB in 2 years and 8MB in 4years then re-asses."
I like the wildcard wondered how you sent0.00, thought you had uncovered a bug ! Thanks for the Dong's bro :-) have sent you some back, lauralou11 too :-)
is 'dong' the sound of BCH stacking up? @stackmyBCH
BCH can't
Because it might be a better option to sell ads spots (better than AdSense model for instance), and if it is the potential is huuuuge
Btc is an interesting alt just coz of LN
You say BCH can't, ok then why? Your reasoning doesn't make sense. BCH can, but no one in this community cares enough to create a place to draw dicks on a wall.
No it isn't, that's why what they are doing is a very stupid approach for their coin's survival. And yes I agree: in some cases centralization doesn't matter much, though we.....
Not at all imo, the price run up started July 17th, the same day they announced BCH fork would happen Aug 1st, the price had already started to crash due to UASF up until that point.
I noticed the same thing. Price run-up was to prevent a flippening.
It's not about drawing dicks on a wall, it's about paying 1 satoshi for each pixel, and being able to rebuy them instantly. It's a different market mechanism than just buying pixels
And why can't BCH do that on-chain? Fees too high?
if the miners want to run his code, they will. if they don't, they won't. but the dude did us all a solid by coding ABC and helping facilitate BCH fork, have a little respect.
I don't get why Amaury thinks going around convincing devs to accept his pre-consensus proposal is a good idea. If he really thinks its important he should convince the miners. What are the other non-miners gonna do?
Is there a site where I can answer questions asked by people in exchange of bch ? I think the community needs something like that for very specific questions. Something like answer-for.cash could be a fun name