No. You *CAN* have both parties to commit a hash of a value @ a funding address, later combining these values w/ MOD(A+B) to get a psuedo-random value (see chainbet protocol).
Spent my day on my Samsung Watch BCH app. CashAccount integration, address monitoring, receipt notifications, and building in vibration and audio alerts. Hashrate and fees coming soon. #dailymemo
Your attempt fits in the "hide the answer" category. Do anything possible to change the subject. Suddenly it is about me "clinging" to IQ and its "supposed applications".
If you could bring yourself to utter your implied question, you will find my answers are more than forthcoming. No question: no answer.
I have no idea why you would ask such a question. To confuse the issue maybe. In any case, you know the answer if you can manage to read/comprehend about 3 lines of text.
If my response was an example of dodging a question, what was the question I supposedly dodged?
It really is interesting to see the mental gymnastics people willingly do to avoid answering (or hide the answer to) the question of on average IQ differences between races.
It's really interesting to see the tenacity with which some cling to IQ and its supposed applications.
Hence the "tourism" aspect of the defamation suit. My guess is UK is friendly to that type of prosecution, and people bringing cases there for that reason eventually became a problem.