Simon Van Gelder

Joined May 16, 2018

"For the world is hollow, and I have touched the sky."

Mute
1AbXxxpmdHsZg3LeotVF63Vt8Ydz2hdgLF
Actions 774
Following 0
Followers 35
Topics following 1
Muted 0
Is Muted By 0

Simon Van Gelder
replied 1795d
Providing singed APKs to be side-loaded is a must...not gonna get that from an app-store.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1796d
Got my hands on an IMB Model M, but the connector is ancient and have been unable to find an adapter. Mechanical switches are worth it IMO.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1796d
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1796d
I'm seeing some artifactual references to "Leo"...old project name, or different project entirely?
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1797d
"The day Facbook announced their exit strategy."
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1797d
If you have FB coins on BCH, you can offer a BCH reward for burning them.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1802d
OK -- main concern was ticker squatting, not fraud -- but good point.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1802d
Currency is a transfer of power: Indeed this can take countless forms.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1802d
Looking at the whitepaper, it seems the Token ID is the genesis TX ID. Now wondering what happens with a hash collision with a new minting.
Simon Van Gelder
1802d
Is there a mechanism that prevents duplicate SLP tickers?
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1802d
I'm guessing the TX fee for the purchase comes from the buyer, ie. there's no fee there if you sell @ 0.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1802d
Just stick on on a Windows XP SAMBA share ...someone''ll be nice and back it up for you.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1802d
Got me a new MEMO...experience was seamless. Great feature.
Simon Van Gelder
1803d · Capitalism
Can't unsee:
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1803d
I ended up installing Electon Cash SLP version. Accidentally burned them on a external TX.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1815d
In it for the freedom: dumping debt-bucks like plague-fallout.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1818d
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1823d
tire-fires sometimes have the best disclosures.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1823d
True, but memo is the conjunction of two networks: blockchain and humanity. "Muting/Blocking" on *EITHER* side (via miners or popular opinion) endangers this intersection's capacity.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1823d
I don't have much of an issue with any individual memo client allowing this functionality, but once these blocks/ignores are on-chain they become indicators that can be abused.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1823d
IRC global ban (sever side ignore).
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1823d
"the 2" being?
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1823d
It would only be implemented by services (since the post on-chain cannot be "muted"). True, users would be the ones "blocking/muting" others, but it's only small step to a g-line.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1823d
Only by hiding the non-nice parts Censorship in the service of entertainment is how we got where we are.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1825d
...apparently building a communication platform, not an entertainment portal. @memo Keep on!