@Alec unions would be more pressured to negotiate based on individual skill and experience, rather than a minimum wage based soley on the position itself.
you know what, "individual" might not be the right term
@Alec unions would be more pressured to negotiate based on individual skill and experience, rather than a minimum wage based soley on the position itself.
What's the deal with Coinex mining? How does it work and why would you do it?
I don't have much of a problem with unions as long as membership is purely voluntary.
Yep, along with the ending of things like the Drug war and other reasons that create more immigration.
I'm all for the natural free flow of humans and labor, but I don't like the current government program immigration has become.
The point LR is making is that there is no room for civilized exchange of ideas or sound arguments with us. The premise is not that we are simply mistaken, but that we are evil.
I understand that. Just want to explain that calling me a "fucking retard" doesn't make me wrong. He says he can't have honest discourse but continued to argue all the same.
Capitalists can't engage in honest productive discussion. They only know lies and propaganda.
Again, not an argument. I could say the same about you but it wouldn't mean shit or discredit your arguments by itself.
@LightRider if you want civil discussion, try being civil. Put down the antifa flag and let's have some productive discussion here.
Seeing idiot capitalists talk about how great capitalism is and how it makes it so everyone gets what they want and need while the planet burns and society crumbles is really something to see.
Not an argument.
This discussion probably should be in the capitalism topic though
Capitalism – Communism. What's the difference? They work so well together, I see no point in trying to separate them.
Except they don't. Even the Nordic Model isn't sustainable forever, mounting debt and ever increasing taxes. It works best with a free market and liberty.
I think the beautiful thing about bitcoin is that it has been rapidly increasing in adoption, despite its anti-state ideological foundation.
All of those utopias people refer to are fueled by capitalism behind the curtain. Especially the Scandanavian "Social Democracies" that use the Nordic Model.
Like moths to the flame, we tread closer and closer towards authoritarianism under the guise of socialism and "progress."
I could never live in a society like China's, and i know that's exactly where the United States is trying to go and follow in their footsteps.
It is way worse than Black Mirror, every thing you do at all times is recorded, there is no voluntary sharing.
Now China is doing Social-Credit where every purchase or sale you make will affect your social credit score, what good is money if you can not chose what to spend it on without consequences.
Heard it can (probably obviously) greatly affect your ability to leave the country too.
Crypto gives me much needed hope for the future, but I do worry about its possible ideological perversion. However, I don't think we can shove it back into Pandora's box, which gives me solace
I'm so very tired of people in, for example, the Nano community making posts like "glad we aren't private, we will get rich cuz gov," I think the fight for fungibility is well worth it
So many people (well, investors), do not share the ideals bitcoin was founded on, and that could prove troubling. Just look where EOS is lol
We shouldn't hold back fungibility because we are afraid the gov. won't back us. They already don't support us, and they probably wont for a very, very long time.
I'm so very tired of people in, for example, the Nano community making posts like "glad we aren't private, we will get rich cuz gov," I think the fight for fungibility is well worth it
Bottom line, people shouldn't need to use an exchange to go through 5 altcoins because each has a single property that's useful to them.
However, I will concede that privacy has its own technical troubles, so coins like nano cannot yet be private on mainchain. Bulletproofs look promising. Tech develops and improves.
Bottom line, people shouldn't need to use an exchange to go through 5 altcoins because each has a single property that's useful to them.
Exactly. Specialization is only good when it is necessary. Crypto communities like to jerk each other off about how special they are, but a lot of these specializations are arbitrary
