"People are dying in those meat packing plants because the state isn't allowing the owners of those plants enough freedom. If only the state would leave them alone, the workplace would improve"
I must say that the debate between a fictitious perfectly capitalistic society and totalitarianism isn't convincing whatsoever. I don't need the Internet to tell me I don't want to live under Stalinism.
Did Satoshi really believe that Bitcoin would be self-sufficient on fees alone in ~120 years or was he knowingly shifting future inflation decisions to later generations?
yes, he was sincere when he said the system could transition to run on only fees
28 votes
· 5,034 satoshis
no, he was passing the buck to future generations
0 votes
· 0 satoshis
not sure, this question makes me strangely uncomfortable
"Theft" also being defined as the *inappropriate* or *criminal* taking of property; meaning, there can exist cases in which taking someone's property is justified / "not theft"
but it's trivial to demonstrate *situations* in which "theft" of a persons property is the least-immoral option, point being: not black-and-white but shades of gray