1DSBRL9Lg6hHDW7u

Joined Mar 09, 2019

Profile not set

Mute
1DSBRL9Lg6hHDW7uaUnSuYixwQoKAJK4Qo
Actions 11
Following 0
Followers 2
Topics following 0
Muted 0
Is Muted By 0

1DSBRL9Lg6hHDW7u
replied 2057d
I agree, but for a business that is relying on information being more or less immediately available from a consistent location, it's kind of an untenable situation. Especially at scale
1DSBRL9Lg6hHDW7u
replied 2061d
It's not about your wallet being unsafe, it's about the data stored and it being reliably available.
1DSBRL9Lg6hHDW7u
replied 2063d
Not running your own node opens you to the risk of having your data up and disappear. Why would you not solve this through a permissioned chain, or just established CSPs.
1DSBRL9Lg6hHDW7u
replied 2063d
It's risky because of the ability to put arbitrary data on the chain, and the fact that nodes can/will prune blocks that are too big/old. Running your own node opens you to risk.
1DSBRL9Lg6hHDW7u
replied 2063d
That sounds like IBM selling off assets to keep their share prices from crumbling. Nothing unusual here.
1DSBRL9Lg6hHDW7u
replied 2074d
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
Still should have been called the doubloon.
1DSBRL9Lg6hHDW7u
replied 2089d
Ah geeze, looks like the communists are right again.
1DSBRL9Lg6hHDW7u
2101d
Data on the blockchain is incredible, but if OP_RETURN values can be discarded by nodes for any reason, it makes the system entirely unsuitable for businesses. It sadly makes it suitable for illegal content. Bad news
1DSBRL9Lg6hHDW7u
2114d
I want to get magic internet money so I, too, can put my most inane thoughts online forever.