BSV has been in top 5 trading volumes and at least 3x ABC. I would be very concerned investor Low fiat volumes is a very bad sign.
If u're talking about CMC's est. of BCH and BSV volumes, there's no way to exclude exchanges that trade IOUs - no deposits/withdrawals. Like Binance. We've to wait to see better data
You can make it so that addresses that haven't been used for 50 years or so, or more to be such... means its money sitting there for that long doing nothing, its either lost or hoarded
I decide what to do with my money and when. Bitcoin makes erasing my money from the ledger almost impossible. Changing that on some chains of Bitcoin will just make them less valuable
If you move your money it's used. If you don't touch it for 100 years the hash function will be cracked and the "sunken" money can be reused. If you ask me: another ingenious feature.
Hacking signing hash function is fine with me, I don't see manipulations with ledger that avoid signing anything on the protocol level, which was the idea on SV side, as valuable
If you want to say anyone can destroy their bitcoins by sending them to some unknown address the way Wormhole does, yes, but as CSW said, no longer used addresses will be mined again.
Who decides what's "no longer used"? It's reintroduction of trust and antithesis to Bitcoin. If such changes will appear on BSV chain, its tokens'll likely lose a lot of value
Roger has officially stopped supporting Bitcoin system, he now supports Jihan's Wormhole Cash. Fuck both of them.
U know that u can "wormhole" any open blockchain, BTC and BSV included, right?
The titles should be Memo BCH and Memo BSV. Those are the correct ticker symbols.
So many that used to get along are now at each other's throats. Which torn more people apart?
Biology. People in confusion pick leaders of their presumed tribe and stick to it in some cases to the end. Trust no one, think for yourself
It’s not swinging based in profits which is the point. Value is solely based on what the miners invested their PERSONAL investment stake in.
Disagree. Value is subjective and price discovery is the most important business among all. Many investments don't fit market's demands and companies go bankrupt
ABCs hashpower has reached all time low. I’d be terrified if I were in ABC. Are you going to trust miners that have only been on network for 7 days? Not me.
Miners on BCH now are pretty much the same as miners of last year's August. Hashrate between Bitcoin chains will continue to swing to match profitability
Mercenary hash is dropping steadily to 39%. BTC miners going back to their chain as BTC starves for hash. What will ABC do when BTC miners abandon completely? Not healthy.
No wonder why BCH hashrate is dropping:
https://www.trinsicoin.com/ and BitMEX'es calculations state clear that both attack and defense are costing each side money. I expect new swings
ABC is not a cash system either. It's a securities platform. Look at all the ICO announcements already. JUST. LIKE. ETH.
Did u miss nChain's plans for tokenization? No open blockchain will be able to escape development in colored coins
The only ticker i want for BCH is its real ticker...BTC :-)
Disagree. Divergence of tickers provides clarity for everyone involved and makes competition less dirty. I was rooting for BCH ticker since the split in August
agree about outside networks. even reading posts here (uncensored/not manipulated) during split is nice. more varied opinions than r/btc. just wish there were more ppl weighing in of course 😊
Memo is a great source to see different opinions.
In the case that Memo only supports one chain, which chain do you prefer?
Memo protocol works on both chains. Don't forget to back up private keys
Nobody but anarchists care about any of that. This site is a fun toy, but hardly noteworthy.
Other people never need to care. Good infrastructure is invisible. Bitcoin was "a fun toy, but hardly noteworthy" for years, now IMF is forced to talk about crypto. Early days
Does this cost the same so memo is auto splitting coins?
Actually the opposite, Memo still doesn't support split-coins.
The only big businesses interested in ABC are unlicensed gambling and moneychangers.
Gambling is the core of Bitcoin's early success. "Unlicensed"? Bitcoin is above jurisdictions. No court can delete this memo. Moving forward OP_RETURN and DSV will enable so much more
BitcoinSV the longest chain today November 20th at 2300 UTC
It certainly isn't. BCH is 46.6% ahead and hadn't lost the advantage since the split
ABC chain is currently 70+ blocks ahead of SV, but why SV blocks are way bigger than ABC blocks in size? Most ABC blocks are no more than a few KB, while SV blocks are several MBs.
Blocks on BSV chain are filled with stress-test txs that are generated on the spot. Likely for several reasons, but one of them is competitive edge over independents
There is no such thing as spam. If you pay for your TX, it is legit.
Even if u send it without the fee. Bitcoin tx has only two characteristics: validity within miner's ruleset and economic feasibility determined by miner, sometimes 0-fee txs fit
Can someone explain to me how we are supposed to be able to scale on chain when spammers can fill the mempool to capacity seemingly at will?
There is no such thing as spam. If you pay for your TX, it is legit.
天立东方百年好合早生贵子
Congratulations! Be careful
If it is a miner bloating their own blocks, it's spam.
Concept of spam doesn't apply to blockchains. E-mails are forced upon u - u've to collect everything to start discriminating, which is not the case with Bitcoin or other crypto
