...FYI my `localStorage` has an entry with key `SessionKey` instead of `sessionKey`
Joined Apr 15, 2018
👏👏 Full year of spamming on-chain. Memo has improved a lot, let's hope for an increased acceleration in the next year.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
oooff... mayor intersectionality/cultural-marxism burn
This is more complicated than it looks at first; don't be hasty when answering.
People want stability. The chaos of weirdness will start to chafe at some point. The chafing-point will be different from person to person, but everyone has one.
In the beginning, when Bitcoin was fully reliant on home miners, it made sense to treat the network with kiddie gloves. Now that mining has turned into a professional business, the training wheels can finally come off of this bicycle. 🚲🎉
BSV & BCH both have limits, though they have different origins. BSV looks to be controlled bottom-up with limits being arrived-at by the miners & BCH is top-down where protocol-devs set the limits.
It is not 100% pure like that at the moment, but it is pushing in that direction.
Should the fictional memo block-user-feature affect the 'shared connections' (rating) score of the blocked user?
In the case of 'yes', the block-action from a very active user should make the rating score go down more than the block-action from a barely active user. Effectively spending more money (miner-fees) makes your block-action more powerful. Assuming it goes this way, imo the block-action of a very active user should lose its weight once the user stops spending money.
Thoughts? No blocking? Have a different number in addition to 'shared connections'? 🔥?
😂😄⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
BTC & BCH split == the first anarchist revolution of Bitcoin.
ABC & SV split == the second anarchist revolution of Bitcoin.
BSV people, keep close to the white-paper/nakamoto-consensus, keep anarchy in check.
