You have a problem with me, punk?
.. just doesn't add up. However that's not the game being played, the game being played is control, not investing.
Companies were paying far higher than AD agencies were worth, but at the end of the day if one always plays with funny money (fiat), can't you always buy out industries that may suit ones agenda?
A normal investor would likely stay away, because it..
I think it was somewhere between the 1960's and 1980's that there was a boom in mergers and leveraged buy outs in the advertising industry. David Ogilvy speaks about it in one of his books.
In my mind, just like MSM, advertising is well controlled too.
Dear @1 @2 @3 @4 @5 & @100 (not sure who's on the team 🤔),
Twetch is looking HOT! Well, bloody, done!
Now keep up the excellent work while I free ride on all of your effort. 😔 Hopefully not for much longer though! 😃
Have you seen "Master Class" advertisements on YouTube?
You know that they are making cover for something when they have Paul Krugman as an economist, Bob Iger from Disney, Natalie Portman, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and Serena Williams.
It kinda makes sense that NYC people can be so brainwashed into a "progressive" mindset.
After all, their city had 3x building demolished on top of them 11th Sep 2001, and they're still passive.
