Q: If enforcing the 1sat/byte minfee is generally now to protect against open doublespends, why don't miners just make a rule to delay 0-fee txs by at least N blocks (N >= 1) as a rule, either informal or coded up?
Remember, BCH was already "ready for trade" when BSV forked.
All that talk of stability, and now their supporters claim they aren't even ready for commerce anymore.
It gets better...
He goes on to say "BSV might have to consider changing the POW algorithm, in order to reboot mining."
If you can't win at SHA256 by attacking BCH in a hash war... #DailyMemo
Best news I've heard all day - BU supporter overheard saying:
"BSV mining is fully centralized. the difference is that BSV is not pretending to be ready for trade"
You hear that? BSV is not ready for trade.
Go BCH.
To the real Satoshi, whether he/she/they may be dead, in prison, under gagging orders, chilling and watching the drama or panicking while watching the drama (if they are spooks): Thanks for bringing us Bitcoin. #BCH
To the real Satoshi, whether he/she/they may be dead, in prison, under gagging orders, chilling and watching the drama or panicking while watching the drama (if they are spooks): Thanks for bringing us Bitcoin. #BCH
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/48kf18/daily_discussion_wednesday_march_02_2016/d0krl0w/
I think that might be what you are looking for? From 8btc.
Yes sir, you have won the prize. That's exactly the post I was looking for - thanks so much!