The idea that we have the power or ability in and of ourselves to come to such a realization is what I contest. What we think is informed by our senses or thru teaching. It is possible to move beyond senses, but only because someone else showed us the way.
And my point is that in order for one to do that, they need to learn that the reality they have been led to believe is a lie. That comes from without. This is why so many accept the mainstream narrative and reject the truth.
It's a meme! But, since you went there...your statement is a bit of a paradox. Freeing oneself implies that the solution is within. Ego is not a solution, and is more often the problem. Freedom comes not from within, then, but from without.
I'd like to suggest a couple tweaks to the input field in Twetch. Make it so that SHIFT-HOME or END will highlight a single row of text. Also, make it so the HOME or END key will move the cursor to the beginning or end of the line you're on. 💙 @852
Unconstitutional. Infringes upon, at the least, the 1st, 4th, and 14th amendments. Lawyers should have a field day with this. As for participating in "their society," they can keep it. BSV is free & open wherever you go.
The question is how it's being spread. So-called "variants" may be mutated versions of the S1 protein, but how do those get spread? Aerosol droplets? Schmutz? Handshakes? How else might these toxins be spread?
Sometimes finding oneself reveals who to avoid. “Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the road broad that leads to destruction, and those who enter through it are many." -Matt. 7:13
It has been said the truth will make us free. The challenge is in realizing that neither the red nor the blue pill lead to the truth. Morpheus is the god of dreams. Time to wake up, then, and see with our own eyes.
There was a time when we had to memorize phone numbers because there were no contacts apps. There was a time when we had answering machines that recorded messages on tape while we were away. I remember getting by just fine and with greater peace of mind.
"no 'victim' of the double spends that occurred have come forward, so it’s possible the attack sought to simply wreak havoc rather than make a profit."
Possible? Or likely? Who goes through the effort to attack a chain without seeking profit?