So my crazy theory is that Kleiman sketched out BTC to CSW, and now CSW is just trying to restore what was Kleiman's original vision. That's why CSW can't code, but I think they exchanged theories b & forth.
50% chance CSW is a fraud who is trying to make a quick buck with a permissioned block-chain with Calvin 50% chance he worked with Dave Kleiman, Hal Finney in the Satoshi team.
In return for forking SV , C+C get tax write off and reduced charges. Five eyes get centralised development protocol, through patent protected insertion points can monitor all transactions in bsv network. Good deal?
Hmm CSW on the run for tax from the ATO. Calvin Ayre having his gambling empire bank accounts in Liechtenstein, Switzerland constantly shut down by the IRS. Now they are pro government with SV. Working with 5 eyes?
I am exploring Bitcoin SV. I am for Bitcoin the idea, not Bitcoin the ticker symbol. Don't really know what it is, but I think it is a system of incentives. We need big blocks, and we need no messing around w protocol
Wow.. been watching some videos. Now I don't know which is better. Am I an idiot for thinking SV might be better? Are 10 block checkpoints really that bad? What if you reorg SV? SV ok w that?
Consider making a $1 donation to eatBCH through scale.cash - you will push out 3,000 transactions onto the chain which will test it and make it stronger, and donate money to kids in Venezuela and S Sudan!
BCH at .03245, $125, when will the bleeding stop? I just bought 2.47 BCH at bargain prices. My guess is .02 lowest of BTC, the market hates checkpointing, doesnt give a shit (yet) if ever about