Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Not only is censorship always bad, but this idea doesn't even make sense technically. Memo (the protocol) is uncensorable by definition, since anyone can broadcast a bitcoin tx. (1/3)
Your client could be set up to ignore dislikes if you want, or to color posts that have a lot of dislikes, or whatever. It's just machine readable info on how some feel about the post.
Not only is censorship always bad, but this idea doesn't even make sense technically. Memo (the protocol) is uncensorable by definition, since anyone can broadcast a bitcoin tx. (1/3)
Your client could be set up to ignore dislikes if you want, or to color posts that have a lot of dislikes, or whatever. It's just machine readable info on how some feel about the post.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
Liking something more than once from the same account doesn't affect ranking. We also can't control what people put on-chain. Thanks for input, will think about ways to improve.
Personally, I don't have a problem with people liking things more than once and I think it should be counted. The "fix" to it being infinite is that it has a cost.
If this fork turns ugly in November BCH will be overpriced at $500
This fork is already ugly - people on all sides have their shit in their hand and are taking aim at the fan.
BCH= Memo, Yours, CoinText, EatBCH etc...
ETH= Cryptokitties and smart contracts?
BCH = memo, yours, eatbch, oyo, bookchain, bitdb, smart contracts, memobutton, moneybutton, memochicken, cashport, handcash, keyport, mattr, bitsocket, bitquery..
ETH = terminally ill
Holy fuck. Because people are being jailed based on arbitrary whim.
Do you also not care about the people who were incarcerated for possession of alcohol back in the day?
Decentralized posting, Blockchain permanence, what else do you need? @_opreturn
The ability to view, make posts, and otherwise interact.
If you can't use it, decentralization and permanence is irrelevant.
Allowed by who? I dont think you understand what I was saying. The people alive today are irrelevant to the issue as humanity isn't capable of this yet.
What would make humanity capable of it?
@esthon, for your tip of 15000 satoshis, I will send 48 txs with the message: no msg... You can watch here
https://seashells.io/v/AMzS9X3h in the run: R1900.
