Better have SV that wants legal global business usage than abc that wants PoS, checkpoints, bucket shops and pseudo anarchy coin that will be marginalized.
PREDICTION: Jihan grudgingly admits defeat along with roger/haipo /Jiang. The dust settles. Merchants/users fall in love with Bitcoin (SV). Jihan joins forces with CSW to take down Core. Moon
Jihan wants more coins as he sells miners. They don't have to be profitable, people just need to believe they can be. He does not care about Bitcoin. He will not join forces with CSW.
Z okazji 100 rocznicy odzyskania niepodległości przez Polskę, chciałbym podziękować wszystkim bohaterom, dzięki którym mogę teraz żyć w tym pięknym, niepodległym kraju!
they looked at nodes. Nodes with BU worked better than ABC or SV. But it was not mentioned what HW was used. ABC potato node will be worthless comparing to high end SV node.
Non mining nodes are worthless when deciding on consensus.
i don't think it's about the HW. as per the report
https://stresstestbitcoin.cash/assets/reports/taste_test_report.pdf
miners had better be using BU by nov. 17 .
they looked at nodes. Nodes with BU worked better than ABC or SV. But it was not mentioned what HW was used. ABC potato node will be worthless comparing to high end SV node.
Sorry but I am monitoring the cash.coin.dance daily and the sum of Coingeek, BMG and SVPool is not surpoassing 44%. When CG lost 6% then SV gained 6%, when BMG lost 5%, SV gained 5%.
But the total hash supporting SV vision has not changed, it is still around 44%... convince me they have more hash involved... i am all for SV, but proof me wrong.
I disagree, Coingeek has consistently had 20-30% of the hash rate for a long time. i also do not see any reason for them to do this cause no profit is made. SV is CSW personal pool
Sorry but I am monitoring the cash.coin.dance daily and the sum of Coingeek, BMG and SVPool is not surpoassing 44%. When CG lost 6% then SV gained 6%, when BMG lost 5%, SV gained 5%.
I think you got carried away a little bit :) My only concern is that eventually someone will mess the protocol so bad, it will be beyond repairing. To me ABC pose more risk and thats why i am against it
@jdh7190 as long as total hash of Coingeek, BMG and SVPool is not increasing substantially i see no reason to be impressed by SVPool hash. Most likely Coingeek is moving some of its hash to SV
If ABC nodes have high chance to go offline during stresstest, Jihan will not support. Since SV is a copy, o doubt CSW would as well. Unless their hardware is far more superior..
I was blocked as well, but managed to get unblocked through one of his colleagues. My tweets were scanned though to check if i am BCH follower or not :P
33.TX per second is not enough IMO. Blaster needs to shoot them at least 10x faster if we want this to be real stress test. 6mins and only 2,5mb block is not enough.