Not religious at all.
You physically choose to make a baby.
The baby will eventually die.
If you did not create a baby that person would not die.
Thus, you have committed murder
Because you have murdered someone in the future, you now owe them more than you can ever repay. Any failure to protect them at least until they are competent is Harm.
So should people be free to breed/sell their children like dogs then? Seems like a perfectly selfish and profitable enterprise to me. How does anarchy prevent this?
This legislation path is a slippery slope of control. Every1 agrees, harming/ selling your child is wrong. (If everyone agrees why do you need the law?)
This is also why multiculturalism doesn't work, because it implies multiple social contracts thatmay contradict each other (and do) grossly. The result: chaos. The dark side uses this
You'll never get a completely homogeneous group. Even in Japan there's actually three native minority groups. The trick is having a shared meta narrative so all can feel at home.
Yes exactly. If a big enough percentage of the population is immoral your "freedom" is going to be a walled compound with you working your ass off to grow your own food. Freedom baby!
If you think about all value/energy flows in society, the more you divert to regulating morality the less there is for moving society forward.
Yes exactly. If a big enough percentage of the population is immoral your "freedom" is going to be a walled compound with you working your ass off to grow your own food. Freedom baby!
With the set up in the videos I linked, if you want protection from more obscure ‘immoralities’ (like people can’t eat meat) you have to pay for it.
I get hung up on the Grand Narrative thing too. Think I get what you're saying. ancaps depends on everyone respecting NAP like ancoms depend on everyone respecting class consciousness?
Yes exactly. If a big enough percentage of the population is immoral your "freedom" is going to be a walled compound with you working your ass off to grow your own food. Freedom baby!
If I work for a company and they threaten to fire me if I break a legit rule, am I being coerced to act a certain way via economic pressure?
You work in a mutually voluntary transaction between you and the company based upon some kind of agreement. If you disagree then you alone are coercing yourself unless you quit.
Point I'm trying to get at is that anarchy ignores Pareto as much as Marxism. Sometimes an evil person wins the IQ lottery and individuals alone are not powerful enough to fight them.
Truth. Evil -often- wins the IQ lottery. Mensa as an organization demonstrates this beyond question. Mensa is mostly joined by people who want to inflict rules upon others.
"people who have no moral issue with being coercive" usually gang up on each other, eventually.
Such behavior creates feedback loops best observed from a safe distance.
Point I'm trying to get at is that anarchy ignores Pareto as much as Marxism. Sometimes an evil person wins the IQ lottery and individuals alone are not powerful enough to fight them.
Such economic pressure is no more coercion than are the hunger pangs that remind you you need to eat. Coercion requires intent, so a natural system cannot be coercive.
There's going to be an enevitable tipping point where enough people who have no moral issue with being coercive gang up on the productive ppl and use the lazy as their shock troops.
You will only feel long-term economic pressure if you have no savings and are unemployable elsewhere. In a free market, "economic pressure" is just the pressure we all feel to survive
Such economic pressure is no more coercion than are the hunger pangs that remind you you need to eat. Coercion requires intent, so a natural system cannot be coercive.
This sounds like you'll need some enforcement mechanism, because you're never going to have a world where a certain percentage of the population isn't intending to be coercive.
Truth, partial Mechanisms exist to deter "those who are coercive" which require no "enforcement". Enforcement == coercion and devolves. Alternatives to coercion are numerous.
If I work for a company and they threaten to fire me if I break a legit rule, am I being coerced to act a certain way via economic pressure?
You will only feel long-term economic pressure if you have no savings and are unemployable elsewhere. In a free market, "economic pressure" is just the pressure we all feel to survive
This topic has the best organized and most thoughtful discussion in all of memo currently (see TOLS's post and resulting thread above). Why are liberty-minded people always so awesome?
A better visualisation of segwit txs would be passangers leaving their luggage (witness part) on a trailer attached to the bus, and then boarding the bus with the legacy txs.
TxStreet has just been updated. Now with Memo support, sideways scrolling, better people spacing, median fee, bug fixes and more! Try holding the arrow keys to scroll side to side.
I am new to this site, and I already love it. I am a big fan of the BCH community and I like the idea of how this all works. Than you guys for making this an enjoyable social platform!
Anyone else notice how the anti-BCH spammers have given up? Seems like memo's incentive structure is working quite well so far. Will be interesting to see how future waves play out.