Why we fight:
This video keeps getting removed from YouTube.
we've already stress tested this software, it isn't clear to me why we ought to stress test again. why?
anyone here use Marco Coino? think we should add BCH ATMs and restaurants accepting BCH via Menufy to Marco Coino?
yes, with a small test before that.
why before?
If CTOR is enabled, I am leaving Bitcoin Cash.
why? I am curious as to the cons of CTOR.
Response from XMR.TO for adding BCH in the Future:
Yes, we are considering it. If there remains traction in general for
BCH in the future, we will add it.
Regards,
XMR.TO Support
This makes me so excited!
https://sluggerotoole.com/2018/10/12/bitcoin-must-die/
go nuts BCH's
this article makes me mad x.x so biased and so short sighted... and suggesting PoS as if it were objectively better than PoW, calling it "legacy" and "easiest to implement"
I don't agree with that, why would you still need banks when having a p2p electronic currency?
for two things: delegation of responsibility (those who want other people to handle the security) and for loans.
We are still in the early days. Once adoption comes, upgrades should be mandatory only if a security bug is found.
"mandatory," good luck with that.. mandatory implies an authority.
Nothing can be mandatory in this sphere, but things can be obvious.
If bch price gets multiplied by 10 fees will get multiplied by 10 right ? That sucks
As the price of BCH increases it will unleash a real fee market where some pools will accept lower fees and some will not.
Why not use the word "Confirmed".
Because that clashes with the technical jargon.
http://badgerwallet.cash/
"Badger is your identiy on this new web."
an SLP, bitbox, bitcoin.com and spendBCH creation.
Could it also function as a standalone memo client? We really need standalone clients truly be uncensorable.
Hi everyone nice to meet you all! I am very new on this website. Quite excited to get to know you guys! I am a Ph.D student in Engineering and also an entrepreneur. Nice to meet you all again!
Nice to see you on here. What brought you here, and what kind of engineering are you studying?
Bitcoin Core is fast? Could you run Memo on Core? The high fees due to using SegWit instead of raising the TX limit from 1mb to at least 8, is why we're using Memo on BCH.
Sorry, when I said Bitcoin I meant the coin described by Satoshi in the white paper, not BTC with segwit and LN.
I am very interested in the idea of an on-chain encrypted messenger but is there a solution to keeping your metadata about your conversations safe?
Isn't it, though? What is "digital cash" if not usable cash?
If people en mass can't use it, due principally to speed, such as is the issue with BTC...
Then it's not digital cash.
Bitcoin IS fast, it has to be to be a good money system, but a permissionless PoW based monolithic blockchain isn't necessary for speed, it's necessary for freedom.
Starting a company takes away all your chances to get welfare goods, and there is so much red tape involved that immigrants not into it all have a big problem finding out how to do it.
We need less red tape.
How isn't it? Memo would not function as a social network on BTC.
sorry, don't misunderstand me. The BCH/BTC split IS about throughout (speed), but Bitcoin itself isn't fundamentally about speed.
🎶I like big blocks and I cannot lie🎶
Increasing block size for Bitcoin seems common sense and elegant.
Lightning Network seems convoluted and overcomplicated.
While I do agree, we should keep in mind that "elegance" is a matter of opinion.
Using memo was a great way to battle depression. And now, I find out it is highly possible the whole thing will die come the Nov. 5 fork.
We will see, but I doubt it. Even in a worst case scenario, a chain will most likely survive.
I tried https://beakerbrowser.com, so fcking slow. Decentralisation is useless guys, get used to it. Nobody cares of that concept. Http is working fine : we won't change. The banking system is working fine : same
Technology will either free us or enslave us, we're pioneering freedom through technology here. It's not about speed, though that will come.
Bitcoin Cash has first layer (on layer) scaling?
BCH scales linearly, but that should be sufficient for the majority of humanity to use it. To answer your question, the first layer of BCH scales fine.
I understand your stance. But, we need to figure out a reasonable balance here. Again, we want more transactions on Bitcoin Cash don't we?
We want more utility. Transaction count is not an end, just a signal we are doing well.
Sorry but you are the the that's being manipulated to thing that Capitalism means one thing, when it doesn't mean that at all.
The first thing you should do in a disagreement is define terms, otherwise you'll find you're simply speaking different but similar languages and no progress will be made.
