We cannot allow Craig Wright to destroy Bitcoin Cash.
What are we supposed to do about it though? The miners hash decides doesn’t it? Our hands are tied unless we want to risk replay/spliting coins early....? Maybe I’m misunderstood?
What are we supposed to do about it though? The miners hash decides doesn’t it? Our hands are tied unless we want to risk replay/spliting coins early....? Maybe I’m misunderstood?
We can choose to use it or not, the people have the power, not Craig or the computers who run his code.
We can choose to use it or not, the people have the power, not Craig or the computers who run his code.
To be honest, doesn’t seem that way. It seems like this whole thing is a giant pissing contest that comes down to who can afford to fund the most mining rigs to “win a hash war”
To be honest, doesn’t seem that way. It seems like this whole thing is a giant pissing contest that comes down to who can afford to fund the most mining rigs to “win a hash war”
We can absolutely fork the hashing algo and then CoinGeek is fucked. Not saying it's optimal but I'm not being ruled by a tyrant and I'm not waiting until these people run out of money
What are we supposed to do about it though? The miners hash decides doesn’t it? Our hands are tied unless we want to risk replay/spliting coins early....? Maybe I’m misunderstood?
We can't allow "others" to rule it either. Perhaps this will be a turning point that eventually leads BCH down its true path. Wait & see.
What are we supposed to do about it though? The miners hash decides doesn’t it? Our hands are tied unless we want to risk replay/spliting coins early....? Maybe I’m misunderstood?
We can change the hash algo if it gets too out of control.
Most of the crooks that we are used to see in Crypto Space are little more than amateurs. But not Craig. ... he had been milking millions from the Australian government... he got duped a committee of profs from
another league ... The man who conned the Ausse government of millions of dollars must have easily duped Calvin and the other nChain investors. The story I read was that those people
paid off his tax debts in Australia in exchange for bitcoin-related patents that "Staoshi" would file for them. Like a professional,
There are many similarities between the way BS took over and how nChain is trying to. Both had constantly changing excuses in the way to power and both had one common goal in mind - TO STOP BITCOIN FROM SCALING.
If I'm right and nChain is an attack on the same magnitude of when Blockstream took over Bitcoin I'd say it's safe to say Bitcoin is dead. The best it'll ever be in that case is Ripple backed by BTC.