is your profile a glider from conway's game of life?
It has been proposed and used as a symbol for hacking.
It’s like VPN. Your data does in, everybody’s data comes out, they still match stuff. Except blockchain is pub so you don’t even need the pen reg.
.. doesn't seem that easy to attack. But if you have some paper that should a realistic attack please share a link.
It’s like VPN. Your data does in, everybody’s data comes out, they still match stuff. Except blockchain is pub so you don’t even need the pen reg.
I don't think it's comparable to a VPS. Going through 5 VPSes you can be attacked by timing measurements. Having your wallet passively shuffle coins with thousands of other wallets ..
Feds aren’t looking for an exact match, just enough for probable cause. You put coins in, and the second they match you to any coins out that’s enough.
But if they get false positives for thousands of people what's the value in seeing that the coins came out from someone? I'm not talking about privacy after a single cashshuffle.
contract-code gets executed IN a virtual machine during tx-processing; code can interact with the whole VM state & therefore needs to be synchronised between TXs, hence single-threaded
Well pipelining in CPUs can parallelize what can be parallelized by predicting/seeing data dependencies. And for multiple small programs, data dependencies probably more localized.
I'm unsubbing from this topic cause BitcoinHoarder is just offtopic shitposting 24/7. We really need that block feature yesterday.
We really need that "block" functionality in Memo... Spam is getting out of hand.
BU is a separate team and I think they have a good chunk of the nodes that run their client. No? And what mass censorship? I see SVs viewpoints everywhere just fine.
cockblockstream can you please stop shitposting and answer me for a moment?
Or is it about the ticker name?
Is it hard for BSV users to understand that some of us that like BCH don't care if regulators won't like out coin etc?
It's not hard for me to understand why some people prefer BSV. I have no idea why people like CSW but as far as the ideas of BSV go, it's a legit position even if I think it's inferior to BCH.
I'm really not sure why we're fighting anymore about the two coins. We both got what we wanted, so what's the problem now?
Yes I like their roadmap. Although I prefer BU when it comes to keeping better PR.
My question is why do we call it "stake"? If it's based on the last N blocks, then it's PoW based, nobody is staking coins to get voting power like PoS implies. Or am I missing someth?
How is Avalanche PoS? Why do people say it is?? Isn't it based on the last 100 mined blocks therefore an extension of PoW? What's the "stake" in Avalanche?
Maybe HL3 will need a QC to run it. They always released every time with new tech.
Sell stuff you don't need on OpenBazzar. Or offer your services on OpenBazzar.
2.2MB doesn't take terribly long to transmit. What percentage of the block's total graphene transmission size is that?
But I've seen other saying that Graphene saves 99%... So I'm not sure if I should trust that 10% that the whitepaper mentions. Maybe "compact blocks" is a form that is already comprsd.
It happened again. Can't post something from the main site, I switch to abc and I can post it, but I see the tx on the SV chain as well. wtf.
2.2MB doesn't take terribly long to transmit. What percentage of the block's total graphene transmission size is that?
Not sure. Very roughly, Graphene is 10% the size of compact blocks according to the whitepaper, and I think that a compact block would mean ~250bytes*1000200=238MB. So about 1%.
And you are using the abc domain with split protection off?
Actually no... This one is on both chains! Argh not sure what is going on. :-D
I think I run out of something, then switched to the abc site and I'm able to post again. But I have split protection and broadcast to both... Blockexplorers show txs only on abc now for me.
