No I have not. Nor will I. What I value may coincide with what you value, or it may not. The important thing is that you acknowledge that value is subjective yet insist upon seeking others' definitions of their value.
Why, especially when your original post already identifies a large chunk of those who value that which you do not. If value is subjective and you know that it is... then know thyself.
It was originally sealed in England by the young King Henry III, acting under the regency of William Marshall, 1st Earl of Pembroke. It was in many ways a companion document to Magna Carta.
The Charter of the Forest of 1217 is a charter that re-established for free men rights of access to the royal forest that had been eroded by William the Conqueror and his heirs. Many of its provisions were in force for centuries afterwards.
Maybe so. But I think Jimmy's point is valid that it's worth loving the "sinner" while not loving the "sin". At least that's how I choose to proceed with my loved ones. Sometimes things take time to evolve, including personal beliefs.
True, some definitely do hate truth it seems. Sadly. The other way I think of some of these interactions, other than not liking the suggestion of being conned, is that they are believers in a new religion and react poorly if their doctrine is under attack