Is a trial merely theater, particularly when communist bedfellows have thoroughly infiltrated all sides and roles?
hosers are sad little commie posers
It's just another flavor of "divide and conquer", "divide and rule". The only task is to continue speaking truth and provoking the natural gift of reason, which all men possess.
Interesting. Do you feel good about saving people as part of your job? Must be pretty rewarding.
Maybe he just doesn't bite the hand that feeds him, being a government employee.
Faces in the tree bark. Very cool.
How can one verify that contact tracing is not just happening anyway? People roam with wifi, gps and data service on all the time.
The data is collected regardless.
The ironic thing is that "are you vaxxed" is much closer to the new "sig heil".
Increasing growth of absurd propositions is a sign of totalitarians knowing that they are failing
No, but one can not deny that some believe God granted them dominion over all other things on earth, including other people. As long as some hold that supremacist belief in their hearts, slavery will be pursued as a birthright granted by God.
So would that imply that Deep Church and Deep State have almost entirely embraced and given in to carnal desires, aka darkness? And that is what makes them who they are, as well as attracts them to each other to operate in organized fashion? Vader metaphor
Light vs dark is embedded in metaphor everywhere for a reason, I suppose. The dualistic nature of man and our eternal internal battle manifests above, as below.
Like Opus Dei is depicted in "The DaVinci Code"? Perhaps the Jesuits... lots of accusations on the web about them. Is there a white hat group in opposition to Deep Church, like Q supposedly is vs Deep State?
Haha! True. They could be taught, by virtuous institutions. Instead, they are led astray into the dark, or left in the dark, by institutions controlled by darkness which profit from darkness in the minds of the many.
Is it shameful to contribute to that?
At least until they figure out the fraud and make claim against it for remedy. Then supposedly, maxim of law kicks in again and a prejudicial decision is easy (as in pre-judge or pre-court).
Doesn't seem to play out so easily though.
My understanding is that the key difference is that Civil abides the maxim of law that "he who would be deceived, let him". Therefore, anyone who isn't smart enough or diligent enough to figure how they are being scammed is up Schitt's Creek.
Absolutely. No brainer use case. Ebay on bsv as well.
Almost any tv "program" fits the bill of incremental steps toward a desired outcome, leveraging human instinct to mimic.
The 1976 movie "The Network" serves as revelation of the method. Many believe disclosure via fiction serves as legal notice. Does it?
Interesting. Roman Civil law allows for such things, but I do not believe Common Law does. "Legal" vs "lawful"
