CoinGeek offers end to hash war in exchange for renaming BCH -> BAB:
CoinGeek is the owner of the largest sustained hash on BCH for months leading up to the November upgrade and therefore the leader of efforts to make
F*ck coingeek. The whole war was about the name in the first place as I mentioned days ago the only reason BSV did not add Replay protection. let coingeek keep losing money unitil D.
Fork to SCRYPT now and call yourselves RogerCoin and we won't destroy you... well not until we start renting SCRYPT miners to kill Litecoin and all other SCRYPT shitcoins.
This time next year, Craig Wright will be forgotten just like a back up villain in a D list superhero movie. No one will care. Tick Tock Mr. Wanker!
To be honest, doesn’t seem that way. It seems like this whole thing is a giant pissing contest that comes down to who can afford to fund the most mining rigs to “win a hash war”
We can absolutely fork the hashing algo and then CoinGeek is fucked. Not saying it's optimal but I'm not being ruled by a tyrant and I'm not waiting until these people run out of money
Agree. The logo looks like Evernote as well. But it's a whale actually, which has big head, then designer said to make it as a chatting bubble. Now, you can see it lol.
There will be no BCH with SV. I believe his intent is to destroy BCH entirely. His SV client and manufactured dissent is just a cover story for a 51% attack on BCH.
ABC is the biggest threat to BTC - with ABC's upgrade BCH will make BTC look like a sad joke.
What are we supposed to do about it though? The miners hash decides doesn’t it? Our hands are tied unless we want to risk replay/spliting coins early....? Maybe I’m misunderstood?
We can change the hash algo if it gets too out of control.
Are you going to use Memo on mobile phone? Chat.Chat is on the way. Now join telegram group and never miss the chance to win early bird rewards. Telegram: http://bit.ly/ChatChatTelegram