"Coingeek is trying to hype the SV price for their fake "scaling Bitcoin conference" this week. I'm fairly impressed with the amount of absolutely 100% false information they've been able to assemble into a grand
Classic NPC focused on the personality of ONE GUY. This is about the consensus rules. The performance issues can be worked on independently without any hardforks EVER.
Yes because one guy owns it. That's the CSW chain. The guy creating money for the world with 400 patents purpose is just to sue everybody. That's why he will mine at 0 for years.
Look at the bigger picture. BCH community will win. When one finally adds replay protection we will have 1 of each. Both of these are better than BTC, ETH, or LTC.Both will survive. $$
BSV won't survive. It's an attack coin, a killer chain. It was created to conquer an existing coin and as such didn't have any support from any legit exchange.
While I agree with you, I think mem devs still needs a few more day to see how the situation evolves and dealing with it. BSV supporters here need to have a voice in memo too.
Memo is open and not censored. SV supporters, fiat supporters and also BTC supports have been having a voice in memo for months. There really isn't much of a reason to fork support.
I got news for you, both these coins are going to near zero. Probably a good strategy to sell both and wait to see who still has hashing power on their coin in a few weeks.
that's dumb. BCH has the name and the eco system. BSV has nothing. The fight was for the name. Otherwise BSV could have just added replay protection.
If the mempools stay consistent across nodes, then any bloom filter based lookup would still work, but orphan rates might be worse than if we have graphene **with** CTOR.