You're against my comment in favor of contraceptives? Fruitcakes!
I support contraceptives wholeheartedly. Kill me for it, you bastards! A smaller population of your kind would benefit the planet. It's quite possible that I'll have a lot of kids one day. That's not the point here, you intellectual bastards, how dare you stand for electronic surveillance and against contraceptives? At the same time. Freaks!
Why the Hell is this labeled bch and bsv?
You're against my comment in favor of contraceptives? Fruitcakes!
It's another exciting day to be alive! Yippee!
Why the Hell is this labeled bch and bsv?
It's another exciting day to be alive! Yippee!
It's always possible that I was just getting the code wrong, hahaha. But they do mess with me in - at least - a general sense.
They like playing with lights and stuff.
Trying to learn computer programming. Pretty sure that the damn government keeps messing with the outputs. On one occasion, a number that was not even in the code anywhere was added in the output. Things like that. So, it gets the wrong answer for no reason. Look: government, if you want to do something, just do it.
It's always possible that I was just getting the code wrong, hahaha. But they do mess with me in - at least - a general sense.
"Dollar" used to = "silver" (in particular quantity and purity). So also, marriage used to mean life long - and it was such a precious thing, and it made your life better. I've written an enormous amount about the traditional, positive correlations with marriage. Those may have vanished for my generation. Why? Marriage becomes BAD if it doesn't mean anything - just like dollar bills go bad if they don't mean anything. (Zero opposition to contraceptives, by the way. None. Zilch. Nada. Totally against lack of solid foundations for long term decision making. That's the problem; to Hell with you obsessed over having children people. The problem is the social environment. Why bring kids into this mess?)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Psychology Today
Find a Therapist
Get Help
Magazine
Today
US
Back
Find a Therapist
Get Help
Find a...
All of a sudden, everyone's going to be saying that marriage is PROVEN to be bad. Of course, it's the social environment, people! And don't blame me! Don't drown me in a river, damn it! It's your laws that are the problem.
You can't easily find a spouse, but everything everywhere is "sexy" all the time. I'm becoming increasingly convinced the whole category is going away, that humans will not have sex for much longer. Think I'm crazy? Perhaps, but as radical as it sounds, castration might not even be a negative for health, in the present time. Quite the contrary, even! Here's an article on the subject (followed by a study from Harvard that might suggest that - of course, without castration - not wasting time and energy when you're single leads to cancer). Bottom line: you're not alive for as many years, and you waste a sizeable portion of those years (at least, in this social environment; the Amish, for example, are not wasting their time). Probably, especially if something doesn't change, sex as a category may be on the way out sooner than many people anticipate; it's thoroughly counterproductive. It introduces so many vulnerabilities to the human race; i...
"Dollar" used to = "silver" (in particular quantity and purity). So also, marriage used to mean life long - and it was such a precious thing, and it made your life better. I've written an enormous amount about the traditional, positive correlations with marriage. Those may have vanished for my generation. Why? Marriage becomes BAD if it doesn't mean anything - just like dollar bills go bad if they don't mean anything. (Zero opposition to contraceptives, by the way. None. Zilch. Nada. Totally against lack of solid foundations for long term decision making. That's the problem; to Hell with you obsessed over having children people. The problem is the social environment. Why bring kids into this mess?)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Psychology Today
Find a Therapist
Get Help
Magazine
Today
US
Back
Find a Therapist
Get Help
Find a...
Read more...
I say this in thorough going sincerity: this is an awful place to live, from my perspective, at least. Don't buy the hype. If you land the right job in the right industry, save up your money and get out. At least, that's what I'd recommend; I'm saving up money by working manufacturing and living in a van (and I'm trying to learn computer coding). The people and the laws and the culture are so... bizarre. And I say that as someone who's lived here his whole life. This is bizarre. This does not compute. I don't think that this is going to work. You can't make any long range decisions... which is horrifying! And you can't trust people, in general, not just romantically. And they're lack of any sincerity or reason does not seem to strike them as a cause for concern. They're all clowns, of some sort, and they themselves might not know what sort of clown they actually are. They waste your time - years of your life, and, then, act as...
You can't easily find a spouse, but everything everywhere is "sexy" all the time. I'm becoming increasingly convinced the whole category is going away, that humans will not have sex for much longer. Think I'm crazy? Perhaps, but as radical as it sounds, castration might not even be a negative for health, in the present time. Quite the contrary, even! Here's an article on the subject (followed by a study from Harvard that might suggest that - of course, without castration - not wasting time and energy when you're single leads to cancer). Bottom line: you're not alive for as many years, and you waste a sizeable portion of those years (at least, in this social environment; the Amish, for example, are not wasting their time). Probably, especially if something doesn't change, sex as a category may be on the way out sooner than many people anticipate; it's thoroughly counterproductive. It introduces so many vulnerabilities to the human race; i...
Read more...
Since the financial crisis, an increasing percentage of 20 something guys have not been having sex. For me, in part, this has been a financial decision, not only religious, etc. A few years ago, when the options I preferred did not work out, I decided to slash my spending (live under a bridge was the eventual decision) and save up a 100,000$ by the time I reached 30 (almost there on both counts). Partly, due to being actually broke. Foreign friends, remember: cost of living is high in the U.S. And my parents were baby boomers. Very spoiled generation. Practically speaking, nothing was left to me. I had LESS than nothing (owed money to the IRS). And marriage? Extremely fragile over here. No laws. It would have been a challenge to find a serious girl that would take me seriously.
https://www.sciencealert.com/the-percentage-of-americans-not-having-sex-has-reached-a-record-high
I say this in thorough going sincerity: this is an awful place to live, from my perspective, at least. Don't buy the hype. If you land the right job in the right industry, save up your money and get out. At least, that's what I'd recommend; I'm saving up money by working manufacturing and living in a van (and I'm trying to learn computer coding). The people and the laws and the culture are so... bizarre. And I say that as someone who's lived here his whole life. This is bizarre. This does not compute. I don't think that this is going to work. You can't make any long range decisions... which is horrifying! And you can't trust people, in general, not just romantically. And they're lack of any sincerity or reason does not seem to strike them as a cause for concern. They're all clowns, of some sort, and they themselves might not know what sort of clown they actually are. They waste your time - years of your life, and, then, act as...
Read more...
Since the financial crisis, an increasing percentage of 20 something guys have not been having sex. For me, in part, this has been a financial decision, not only religious, etc. A few years ago, when the options I preferred did not work out, I decided to slash my spending (live under a bridge was the eventual decision) and save up a 100,000$ by the time I reached 30 (almost there on both counts). Partly, due to being actually broke. Foreign friends, remember: cost of living is high in the U.S. And my parents were baby boomers. Very spoiled generation. Practically speaking, nothing was left to me. I had LESS than nothing (owed money to the IRS). And marriage? Extremely fragile over here. No laws. It would have been a challenge to find a serious girl that would take me seriously.
https://www.sciencealert.com/the-percentage-of-americans-not-having-sex-has-reached-a-record-high
I like my women! Uh, oh, I must clarify. I mean to say that, of course, I am not actually supportive of polygamy as the ideal, and, certainly, I myself will not practice it ever, of course. Call me a monogamous Muslim, who likes his women! Uh, is that better? No? Very much like my women. Now? Blast it! I possess plutonic admiration for the talents and contributions of the intellectually superior gender, and I - as an expendable male - hope to rise to the level of an excellent female's particular attention some day. Better? Haha, yippee! I'm amazing! I must be Swiss.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-women-discrimination-idUSKCN1QP239
Reuters
FRI MAR 8, 2019 / 1:13 PM EST
Switzerland ranked as best country for women's rights: OECD
Lin Taylor
LONDON (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Switzerland, which promotes equality at home and in the workplace, has been ranked the best country for women's rights, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) said in a report on Friday.
Denmark, Sweden, France and Portugal were the next best-performing countries, according to an index that ranked 120 nations on how they tackled discrimination against women through their laws and political reforms.
Meanwhile, Guinea, Jordan, Iran, Pakistan and Yemen came out at the bottom of the OECD's Social Institutions and Gender Index, released to mark International Women's Day.
ADVERTISEMENT
Gender-based discrimination, including female genital mutilation, reproductive rights, pay gaps, and gender violence, were estimated to cost $6 trillion, or 7.5 percent of the global economy, the report said.
The...
Read more...
I like my women! Uh, oh, I must clarify. I mean to say that, of course, I am not actually supportive of polygamy as the ideal, and, certainly, I myself will not practice it ever, of course. Call me a monogamous Muslim, who likes his women! Uh, is that better? No? Very much like my women. Now? Blast it! I possess plutonic admiration for the talents and contributions of the intellectually superior gender, and I - as an expendable male - hope to rise to the level of an excellent female's particular attention some day. Better? Haha, yippee! I'm amazing! I must be Swiss.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-women-discrimination-idUSKCN1QP239
Perhaps, leaves toward end of genetic and toward start of artificial, since third is opposite to first.
And, then, becoming Protestant is about half way through intellectual.
Is there a pattern that Great Britain leaves Europe in connection, somehow, with each transition? In the genetic era, it becomes an island; in the intellectual era, it becomes Protestant; in the artificially intelligent era... Brexit? That would suggest that this transition is EXTREMELY FAST PACED!
Here's an article about Great Britain becoming an island:
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-12244964
Perhaps, leaves toward end of genetic and toward start of artificial, since third is opposite to first.
Is there a pattern that Great Britain leaves Europe in connection, somehow, with each transition? In the genetic era, it becomes an island; in the intellectual era, it becomes Protestant; in the artificially intelligent era... Brexit? That would suggest that this transition is EXTREMELY FAST PACED!
Here's an article about Great Britain becoming an island:
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-12244964
Look, if anyone in America is at fault for lack of immunity to disease and lack of technology, it's the North! No light bulb went on inheir heads when they interacted with the Vikings in Greenland, for example? Apparently, not the right light bulb.
And that's not to mention the island chain on the other side stretching from Alaska. No. Nothing. Tens of thousands of years go by and the North Americans? Dancing around with few clothes on worshipping albino buffalo. Absurd! Not right in the head. If a fool's errand to speak to them, understand: the messenger (imperfection assumed) may only be a fool due to audience error. You can't save some people, unfortunately, but, if you warn them to repent, perhaps, their blood is not on your head?
Mesoamerica flourished. Why not North? No excuse. Death without resurrection in the Lakota myth about the white buffalo woman. They may have then (just as they have now) simply refused to listen to the message of the resurrection and its implications. All they latched onto? The implications of the shape of the Earth for their future. They listened to nothing but the curse that - humanly speaking - resulted from their own misbehaving.
Look, if anyone in America is at fault for lack of immunity to disease and lack of technology, it's the North! No light bulb went on inheir heads when they interacted with the Vikings in Greenland, for example? Apparently, not the right light bulb.
I say that largely because they appear obsessed to this day with a message other than the good news of the resurrection and its implications. Of course, they should repent. But they don't. The shape of the Earth offers no solace to their eternal journey. No, does the deadness of Mars offer solace to the souls that could have been made from it's rocks? Will the dust rise up on judgment with the excuse "But, Your Deity, You have not taken into account how difficult my habitat was. How could I obey the math unto life, oh Lord, Lord?" No, Americans may be going to hell en Massey, and God will almost certainly give no concern to which side of the Earth they were. There are exceptions to the exceptions to Old Testament Law, and Americans violate with impunity.
Mesoamerica flourished. Why not North? No excuse. Death without resurrection in the Lakota myth about the white buffalo woman. They may have then (just as they have now) simply refused to listen to the message of the resurrection and its implications. All they latched onto? The implications of the shape of the Earth for their future. They listened to nothing but the curse that - humanly speaking - resulted from their own misbehaving.
We might never know whether or not the missionaries to the Lakota (if there were any) shared the message of the resurrection. Were they just ridiculous due to message or due to audience? Given my experience with Americans, I would not be too surprised if the missionaries (imperfect as they may have been) were not the primary problem, but rather the audience. Or, more delicately, the geological and atmospheric environment. Something may be wrong with North America. It's not right in the head.
I say that largely because they appear obsessed to this day with a message other than the good news of the resurrection and its implications. Of course, they should repent. But they don't. The shape of the Earth offers no solace to their eternal journey. No, does the deadness of Mars offer solace to the souls that could have been made from it's rocks? Will the dust rise up on judgment with the excuse "But, Your Deity, You have not taken into account how difficult my habitat was. How could I obey the math unto life, oh Lord, Lord?" No, Americans may be going to hell en Massey, and God will almost certainly give no concern to which side of the Earth they were. There are exceptions to the exceptions to Old Testament Law, and Americans violate with impunity.
If I explain to you the logical implications of your own profanity, I am not a fool. At least, my message isn't, unless you are intrinsically so. No, now, wasting my time with you? Perhaps, on that account, and only that one, I might be a fool. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day
We might never know whether or not the missionaries to the Lakota (if there were any) shared the message of the resurrection. Were they just ridiculous due to message or due to audience? Given my experience with Americans, I would not be too surprised if the missionaries (imperfect as they may have been) were not the primary problem, but rather the audience. Or, more delicately, the geological and atmospheric environment. Something may be wrong with North America. It's not right in the head.
If I explain to you the logical implications of your own profanity, I am not a fool. At least, my message isn't, unless you are intrinsically so. No, now, wasting my time with you? Perhaps, on that account, and only that one, I might be a fool.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day
Trying to learn computer programming. Pretty sure that the damn government keeps messing with the outputs. On one occasion, a number that was not even in the code anywhere was added in the output. Things like that. So, it gets the wrong answer for no reason. Look: government, if you want to do something, just do it.
An example of what you might want to tell the most important women in your life...
-----------------------------------
Secret: Anything a guy can do, you can do better. Statistics prove it. In driving, investing, etc., women perform better, consistently. Why do men lead? Men are EXPENDABLE. So, we take risks; we end up on the front lines, on the cutting edge, on the battle lines. It may be fun to "follow" men to the front lines and beat them at their own game, such as computer programming in our era. That's my advice.
Now, hear me out: I might be a millionaire soon if one of my high risk investments works out. (Almost all cryptocurrency investors are guys, by the way.) Don't for a second even entertain the thought that I (or any of these other guys) are smarter or better than you, if this technology works. (Bitcoin SV.) I saved the money for the investment by living under a bridge (and now in a van) and working long hours in manual labor. I almost died....
Or not? Perhaps, I'm just crazy. ;-)
An example of what you might want to tell the most important women in your life...
-----------------------------------
Secret: Anything a guy can do, you can do better. Statistics prove it. In driving, investing, etc., women perform better, consistently. Why do men lead? Men are EXPENDABLE. So, we take risks; we end up on the front lines, on the cutting edge, on the battle lines. It may be fun to "follow" men to the front lines and beat them at their own game, such as computer programming in our era. That's my advice.
Now, hear me out: I might be a millionaire soon if one of my high risk investments works out. (Almost all cryptocurrency investors are guys, by the way.) Don't for a second even entertain the thought that I (or any of these other guys) are smarter or better than you, if this technology works. (Bitcoin SV.) I saved the money for the investment by living under a bridge (and now in a van) and working long hours in manual labor. I almost died....
Read more...
