147d
Sounds dangerous :) its going away from PoW from what i know, so nothing good for bitcoin.
  146d
No, Avalanche doesn't affect consensus, because is pre-consensus. It improves 0-conf safety, which is needed for adoption. Forfeits are great, but only useful for big purchases.
  146d
What is Avalanche?
  145d
"Avalanche does not affect consensus because it is pre-consensus" ??
  145d
It would work better like this
  145d
"Avalanche does not affect consensus because it os AFTER consensus"
  145d
What does Avalanche once a block is mined?
  135d
Seems like a good idea to me.
  135d
0-confirmations accepted on exchanges is not new. XVC had that on Poloniex about 2 years back.
  134d
PoS pre-consensus, really? is this still bitcoin?...
  134d
If avalanche is soft-fork, can the pre-consensus pow be replaced with pos also as a soft fork?
  121d
Amaury explains it better and simpler:"Basically, it is like Ripple" RIP
  120d
Avalanche seems like a great idea the more I hear about it. Helos scaling, and protection against double spends.
  100d
I'm not sure why so many people are assuming they will jump straight into PoS with Avalanche, they've said they eventually intend to base selection on PoW contribution for over 100 prior blocks
  100d
I think it's an elegant and practical solution. I was a fan of 0-conf forfeits, but I think that this will add a considerable amount of security
  99d
Anybody knows if avalanche will make it into BCH?
  98d
Never, if they're lucky.
  88d
Avalanche preconsensus does have some good potential. Can't wait to see how well it works.
  88d
Is it in alpha now?
  76d
Just when I thought they are not going to do it
  76d
BCH Devs: Making @SharkPoolCash job easier daily. Since 2018. @_opreturn https://memo.cash/topic/Avalanche