The most reasonable thing for november would be to have no fork at all.
The threat by some groups to attempt a fork sounds so odd to me. The stress test proved BCH works. I don't really enjoy any group trying to fiddle with it much. Bitcoin Unlimited it is.
Miner votes. There is no fork, only politics. Speak up or risk Bitcoin being hijack yet again.
Second of all, a transaction T1 accepted on ABC thread at one point in time and SV at another, BU will have to reject one of those blocks as T1 cannot happen twice. Even worse if doublespend
This will end in chaos, with exchanges suspending BCH deposits/withdrawals. I'm for no fork too or at least, avoid CTOR for the moment and reach consensus about OP codes.
It seems companies and miners are starting to take sides... which do you all support?
There is only Satoshis vision. All else is doomed to fail.
Satoshis Vision is such a shitty name. It's essentially saying "If you aren't with me, you are against me". "Only my vision is satoshi's vision. I am satoshi."
Bitcoin ABC devs believe in Satoshi's vision for digital peer-to-peer cash just as much as everyone else.
