Forks as a demerger, or a split as a copy?

Mar 21
There is a lie and myth of decentralised consensus where a small group of developers alters a protocol and says that it is a fork that somehow relates to the original system. Bitcoin was said to be set in stone, and it is the only way the system works. I shall detail in this post why Bitcoin must follow the original protocol and why alterations that take away from the white paper mean that they are no longer Bitcoin.

Forking the software is not the same as altering the protocol. There is a radical difference that people have been trying to obscure. The reason for doing so is simple; they are misleading investors in a false and vain long-term attempt to hijack a system.
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*zIMOakIs4pECHV_m6LeK4w.png

A split would be covered by demerger law if completed legally and not as an airdrop…
The key technology within Bitcoin is the ability to create a single ledger. It cannot be divided into two and re...