Anarcho: Imagine being tied up to a totally wrong narrative, and somehow doubting it, and also seeing perceived right wing extremists pointing out weaknesses in your narrative.
Certainly you don't want to be corrected by an extremist, you are much better than those guys, so now you are totally committed to your narrative. But you also see it is getting silly.
I think anger would come rather naturally in such instances.
As usual, SILENTSAM is avoiding the content of the video in order to repeat generalized talking points. Oh, and he did not look into the data. He just knows that's what he is supposed to say
I tried calling that helpline, and I was rejected for being quote "not hateful enough to require our help". I asked if they had ever met one of these hateful individuals, they said no.
Question to global warming alarmists: Suppose you were wrong about your view on the issue, what would it take to change your mind? How could any counterargument not just make you more angry?
I feel no obligation to take seriously a liar who has shown that she does not care about her the righteousness cause, but still annoys the majority here with it, and even calls for violence
... Even when they feel the need to prove that they are liars directly with another post I still do not feel any such obligation
OK, it seems my attempts at starting a meaningful conversation are a total failure.
I did not pretend no one responded, but to me nobody worthy responded. I have discussed this with SILENTSAM before, and made it clear that I find him to be not worthy my time. Same for LR.
