40-60% miners backing BitcoinSV; 21-39% miners backing BitcoinABC.

Maybe you should consider the case where the BTC/BCH split was not an attack, and the ABC/BSV is not either - they might just be differences in opinon and forking is the proper outcome.

SV is obviously the takeover attack. Not sure how anyone can see that this isn't an attack. As it is Blickstream devs support SV.

SV fighting against ABC's upgrade makes them in my eyes nothing more than another Blockstream take over attempt.

I think if CSW & nChain do hire more hashing power to commit 51% attack they would openly expose themselves as enemies of Bitcoin & no one would ever trust them any more.

Why would anyone waste all that money especially if their ulterior motive is to make money?

Jihan Wu - "From the very beginning I have had a conspiracy theory that CSW is a spy controlled by Blockstream." https://twitter.com/JihanWu/status/1060396271888789504

If he cares so much about Bitcoin why didn't he make all these threats about attacking the exchanges and competing chain and using his 1M coins to crash the market in a total war against BCore

"BSV simply increases the default max blocksize without any underlying enhancements to the protocol which enable it to reach that capacity" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3_MyOvVcGs

Anybody worried that since ABC is backed by bitmain the massive amount of SHA256 will be behind the ABC fork for just long enough to be considered the "winning" chain?

Why didn't the miners just force a hardfork on the chain against Core?

Didn't Craig show some plan to block the changes that the core team wanted long before the split? If memory serves, it was a hashpower based approach.

Good news, they gave me a 10 additional invites. https://initiativeq.com/invite/HzZEx4JnQ You are welcome.

Do you have any information on who funds Bitcoin ABC?

Even if I hated CSW (I’m neutral), i’d still respect the Nakamoto consensus. BS has zero hashpower and took over BTC. What’s up with minority/zero hashpower ruling ? 🤦‍♂️

1 CPU/Dollar risked == 1 vote. this is not at all like blockstream subverting and capping the ballsacks of the BTC miners. this is miners finally understanding their role in this system

Which of course we cannot expect super-technical developers to understand the economics of this system, bitcoin is not a software project for a client! it is an economic, global payment system

First BS took over by convincing the users not to ever hardfork, but now BCH has low hashpower and is far easier to attack. What if SV rents enough hashpower to rule BCH?

Get your free coins! Only few slots left. https://initiativeq.com/invite/HzZEx4JnQ

Perhaps the most important question at this crossroads: Can you REALLY know ABC/nChain aren't another Blockstream type infiltration?

How Bitcoin (BCH) Goes 'To the Moon' - https://www.yours.org/content/how-bitcoin--bch--goes--to-the-moon--e0164b72cfd2

Shit is crazy ATM. Bch price rising, discussion around fork day ramping up, tether imploding - very exciting!!

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9p1zi8/call_for_questions_qa_with_the_bitcoin_sv/e81m4ch/ - ABC dev states CTOR puts a cap on large miners, but helps small/mid-size miners

I thought CTOR was also supposed to optimize efficiency of big blocks. Even if this wealth-distribution-therefore-bad narrative is true (I cannot tell) how to compare with supposed advantages?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2765PgtHkVk&t=345s this is so good, puts the upcoming events into perspective big time