Memo SV
  • Home
  • Posts
  • Tokens
  • Topics
  • Profiles
  • Signup
  • Login

Topic Threads: Graphene vs Lightning

Back to Topic All topics

  • 1

If you look at Figure 4 from page 7, you'll see a chart that shows there is more space per node for transaction data.

13 replies Active 2772 days ago Graphene vs Lightning

Minimum fee isn't based on "goodwill". Miners don't mine for altruistic reasons.

3 replies Active 2772 days ago Graphene vs Lightning

Obviously they're different technologies, however the main purpose of their implementation is for reduced fees. There'd be no reason to implement these technologies otherwise

6 replies Active 2773 days ago Graphene vs Lightning

To say it WON'T reduce fees on BTC's blockchain without any justification is incorrect. "Graphene reduces traffic overhead by reducing block overhead" - from Whitepaper, by 10x less

1 replies Active 2774 days ago Graphene vs Lightning

Which is why big blocks already solve the problem for BCH. But for BTC, they can just as easily implement graphene as well, leading to 10x reduced fees on their blockchain.

1 replies Active 2774 days ago Graphene vs Lightning

BTCs lightning is an unworkable joke.

1 replies Active 2774 days ago Graphene vs Lightning
  • 1
About Privacy Terms Stats
© 2024 Memo Technology, Inc.
  •   English
  •   Español
  •   中文(简体)
  •   日本語
  •   français
  •   svenska
  •   한국어
  •   Ελληνικά
  •   Polski
  •   Português
  •   Čeština
  •   Nederlands
  •   Русский
© 2024 Memo Technology, Inc.