this is a proposal so anyone is free to support it or not
example of the simplification process over time, the wallet would do it for you automatically:
1263256 => 1M26326 => 1M2633 => 1M264 => 1M27 => 1M3 => 2M
if you don't include the block # timestamp, then it is still valid also but will directly query the paymail provider, so we only add a new way to route paymails from the blockchain identity
in some cases or after a certain amount of block has passed your timestamped paymail can even be simplified:
[email protected]:680k
or
[email protected]:0.68
which both mean "before block 680000"
and the previously shared ones remain valid
so we keep the benefit of paymail but add censorship resistance for the cost of adding a 6 digit number
I think the compromise can be interesting
How would we do without the government not... implementing minimum price laws to protect sellers from getting taken advantage of by greedy consumers seeking discounts
wait what ?!!
Twetch and other apps should NOT rely on paymail as identity but on the identity key and change payments destination to the latest onchain paymail
we should be able to have a stable onchain identity based on the identity key that we should be able to import into another wallet with our seed and publish onchain that now our identity is linked to a new paymail
is the identity key on moneybutton non-custodial ?
do you have a way to restore it from your seed if your account gets banned ?
@2459
now see with @4 and @852 team why your moneybutton paymail is still the one receiving from twetch interactions and how that can be fixed
is the identity key on moneybutton non-custodial too ? do you have a way to restore it from your seed ?
interactions from twetch still show up on moneybutton as going to your paymail which is weird
confusing, so what happens to your paymail then ?
the paymail you bought will be resold and if people send money to it you will not receive further payments but someone else or moneybutton will I guess
relayx restricts acces to encrypted data by domain to limit abuse, MB doesn't limit yet as far as I know
your request would be trivial if we had a filesystem of encrypted data
like baemail but you can sign access to the data from another domain
example of how to solve this:
on sign up, a page displays 2 questions:
- how much do you feel is inconsequential to spend ? : $0.10 (default for your country)
- how much is a lot ? : $100 (default)
and you allow the user to pass or edit these fields
you just made my day - literally - and got a new etsy order ! 😄
stablecoin narrative is so 2020
we are on to stablecards now
multi-custody is the future where users control who they give custody to and key management of your own keys & those of others that gave you partial custody is automated behind simple actions like a password + biometric encryption
would you say Handcash is a partly custodial wallet? as in handcash has some shares of the custody and shares are divided between parties.
Honestly I think for most nocoiners it would be best to start with a multi-custodial wallet than lose their privkey
