Bitcoin Verde: A New Consensus Full-Node Implementation for BCH
http://bitcoinverde.org/
Bitcoin Verde is a ground-up implementation of the Bitcoin (Cash) (BCH) protocol. This project is a full node, blockchain
XRP is similar to Blockstream in its use of propaganda, and it's generally the BSV of crypto - a coin which was created to leech value out of something else rather than to exist on its own.
BchABC is leeching too :)
Yeah for memo it's ok (and your site works well)
But I just feel people can't build serenely with bitdb due to that kind of issues
Bitdb is sometimes so slow, I can't have the topic "IRC" on your site :/ unwritter really needs to "patch" that. His work isn't realiable at all
But your site is pretty fast ! Good job
I tried to report the issues to Ryan X. Charles on Twitter. Not sure why they'd want to lose the traction they had, but obviously they've shifted all resources to Money Button.
It's funny how they worked great on BCH, but have imploded now that they are on BSV.
Both, but bsv by default if I remember well
LN capacity is going up
Can't wait to see if it will work
I guess trust will be built on the next "bull run". No one cares now of adoption and trust, but let's wait a couple of years to see which Bitcoin sticks
Imo it'll be bsv thanks to the devs, but it's ok to think it'll be bch (thanks to merchant adoption) or btc. I'm not sure myself
experience with how useful BSV is you completely kill it by stealing all their money. NOw they will NEVER trust Bitcoin EVER again."
I guess trust will be built on the next "bull run". No one cares now of adoption and trust, but let's wait a couple of years to see which Bitcoin sticks
Coming soon...
LN hub owner gives up:
Funds have to be online/hot. Introduces counterparty compared to hardware/paper wallet
Funds are locked in channels. If the other side of the channel is unreachable, you need to wait up to weeks
It's the guy from shitcoin.com, not a random hub owner. Actually the capacity of the Lightning Network is going up every week
just wants to fulfill "Satoshi's Vision" (taking ownership of the brand),and just another step in a strategy devised years ago which is trying to make hardforking away of BS impossible
No it has some issues. It changes the "incentives of bitcoin", it changes how bitcoin works, it's not necessary, and some others things
...avalanche: miners doing lots of extra, basically pointless communication for the same tx-fee
If they solve the double spend problem the same fee in satoshi will be worth more USD
Why should miners be solving DS attempts? This should be up to merchants. Wrong economics.
If miners can solve that easily they should do that. It increase the value of "Bitcoin" as a whole
Having said that, BCH is still a shitcoin now, and not a Bitcoin system any more. Centralised checkpoints, DSV, CTOR and coming Avalanche are all changing how BCH works & ABC devs are traitors.
It was a "Blockstream's Vision" honeypot.
Ahah you never stop your propaganda
Have you ever done that ? I'm pretty sure even nowdays you can't go to your bank and ask 100k
And if you need to spend 100k you can do that on chain even if you pay a 100$ fee
And LN will end up being centralized so you'll just have to up all your money to a good hub (aka bank) to have no liquidity problem
And I believe the population will prefer to use that kind of system so that no one can see what they buy (this isnt true for bch, you need to shuffle and care of what coin you spend)
In the real world you don't spend a lot of money at once so 99.9% of the people won't ever see this problem (it exists for fiat too, and no one cares that you can't withdraw 100k)
And LN will end up being centralized so you'll just have to up all your money to a good hub (aka bank) to have no liquidity problem
In the real world you don't spend a lot of money at once so 99.9% of the people won't ever see this problem (it exists for fiat too, and no one cares that you can't withdraw 100k)
