I burnt 100k sats testing my new "metanet app", and I think the network is unreliable, the "few datacenters (miners) available for you" narative is a lie. Moreover the network latency is "slower" than before the split
I'm doing the same thing, playing a snake game and posting moves on the blockchain. Before the split the "latency" was less than 1sec 90% of the time, now it's completly random
I burnt 100k sats testing my new "metanet app", and I think the network is unreliable, the "few datacenters (miners) available for you" narative is a lie. Moreover the network latency is "slower" than before the split
Bitcoin : the only payment system in the world where using too much your money makes you unable to use it. Pretty annoying ! (I guess it's the limit of number of chained txs)
Hope SV will remove that limit for Metanet
Don't spread lies. You don't know about the $0.01 fees
The current 6-monthly hard-fork schedule of BCH:
Scheduled hard forks are insanity.
"6 block fees : .72$" wow. Is it site reliable ?
It's 'awesome' to have such fees during bear market
Slapping them to show he’s king kinda. Like “I told you so”
These BSV blocks are absolutely HUGE. It makes BTC and BCH look like jokes.
Ok, feel free to try that on Bitcoin Cash BCH.
I think you may find it harder / costlier than you imagine.
There are doing that for stress test I believe, they have programs and we get huge blocks
But maybe you're right and it's hard to propagate lot of small txs instead of few big ones
Ability to validate huge amount of transactions are very IMPORTANT for a world currency system, even thought these are standrand transactions.
I agree but that's not work that the spammer has to do, right ?
(It was about BSV is easier to spam than bch)
Hopefully software will improve and validation won't be an issue anymore !
Just that it's harder in terms of effort needed.
You can program your computer to sign them all and he'll do that in few minutes (or more)
I agree swiping 1400 is ridiculous but you can do without that. As you said it's just for fun
Non-OP_RETURN scripts cost more CPU cycles and memory, that's the main difference. After network stress succeed, we need to stress test other hardwares, i.e. CPU, memory, bus and etc.
You mean it's harder to build them ? You can spend a week building them and spamming the network a single day
Or do you mean the validation ?
I'm not here to convince you, I wish you the best of luck on SV and Metanet.
I'm looking for documentation / whitepaper on Metanet, couldn't find anything,
Seems to be just an idea for now (I believe some are writing their vision for that project on honest.cash or whatever). And maybe you are looking for unwritter slack room
No you can't spam it as easily with large data transactions, unless you are a high-powered miner.
But I agree you can't easily do 100Kb txs
No you can't spam it as easily with large data transactions, unless you are a high-powered miner.
What's the difference between a 100kb tx and 500 txs of 200b ?
Maybe it's a bit harder because you need to code to do 500txs quickly but I think it's the same
Not "fill a 100MB block", but use up 100% of the network's current capacity. That's the difference.
There are many other reasons I don't put my trust in the SV network.
If you have a link where there is a list of these reason that would be cool. I'm willing to change my mind (I'm pro SV coz of Metanet) if these reasons aren't "Craig is a scammer"
Not "fill a 100MB block", but use up 100% of the network's current capacity. That's the difference.
There are many other reasons I don't put my trust in the SV network.
How is it easier to use 100% network capacity in BSV than bch ? You can spam bch with random txs the same way you would do 100Kb op return tx, you'll pay the same amount of fees
I mined a 100 Tb on my private blockchain. I stole this idea from CSW 😂
I'm not sure to understand. You dislike sv because one user can fill alone a 100Mb block ?
