They won't use a bch token but more something like Liquid
Users will have spv nodes i guess
Ok, but that would make IBD (initial blockchain download) impossible for the average person in the inevitable end.
Yep. But it's not a problem for bsv because users won't download the chain
Btc don't need marketing. Bch and bsv do
What do you think about that ?
Isnt it biaised thanks to cash Shuffle or services like that ?
Kinda scary that a network update can lead to no confirmed txs / unsecure network for an hour. Maybe if all miners were using different software this bug wouldn't happen
Howerer this was fixed quickly. Good job bch
Founders of a startup have a lot of shares of their company, same for icos, same for crypto
Every time you confirm again and again BSV=BTC.
Fine. But be sure to read other SVguys than me
Litecoin was a scam from the start:
"The first 10000 blocks of Litecoin were mined in a bit over 23 hours. 576 should've been mined in one day according to officially communicated blocktime of 2.5 minutes.
It's not a "scam" just a way for the dev to earn money for their work
I'm happy to use both chain so I am a user of the SV branch. If you want to support bch only you can tip your account with bch only and ignore users posting on SV only
The "anyone" needs to be able to read this memo protocol
Bitcoin.com don't do that https://explorer.bitcoin.com/bch/tx/62656a60635eddb7138e278a779c01fe84f5125bf78c1171a8aae0991df97f29
Hey that’s cool, so now a way to send ANYONE BCH with a note attached, love it! -just have to know their address first I suppose, maybe you can add a QR scanner at some point too...
How is bsv "permissioned" ?
I answered that LN can scale with channel factories and got instantly blocked. This is hilarious
The echo chamber of pro-bch people is real (same for bsv). This is sad
So an increase in shit talking may be a sign of a growing community in general - people silently moving over from BTC or other coins... Maybe! Who knows.
Why not !
Some people focus on that. But the community at large is focused on tribalism and trash talking other forks
Bch thinks BSV is an attack on bitcoin, not the opposite
@Bitcoin is only talking about bch, never bsv/btc
And maybe some miners will accept lowers fees. But indeed it will increase fees on the short term
The thing I'm unsure is the 1sat/b for 0confs ..
I don't know if we can easily lower that limit. Because if you have to update your node to lower that limit then not everyone will do it and .1 sats/b will propagate less easily than 1
Just a reminder that if the BTC or BCH price increases, so do the fees by the same multiplier. $5 fees at 5,000 become $50 at $50,000. .3 cents only turns into 30 cents at the same rate.
And maybe some miners will accept lowers fees. But indeed it will increase fees on the short term
The thing I'm unsure is the 1sat/b for 0confs ..
