Nikamoto

Joined Jun 23, 2018

Profile not set

Mute
13oehNJBs5bpGy4mcA1EXqB3A55TfpMAwX
Actions 1,080
Following 30
Followers 26
Topics following 12
Muted 0
Is Muted By 0

Nikamoto
replied 1855d
So you don't support the US or any country in the world ?
The "hashwar" was entertaining anyway
Nikamoto
replied 1855d
Why not ? The chain is working fine, and reorgs doesn't affect users
Nikamoto
1855d
On SV reorgs https://www.yours.org/content/on-forks--orphans-and-reorgs-0c0c39d3c79b
I'm "pro SV" but I really feel like SV is about watching something bad happens, and then find a way to say it's a good feature
Nikamoto
1856d
Trying to make a twitter account to follow what's happening on Bitcoin but right now my twitter feed is crap. Who should I follow ?
I want only Bitcoin stuff. And no one posting "just use bch it works" it's boring
Nikamoto
replied 1857d
No txs are lost during re orgs
Nikamoto
replied 1857d
SV supporters are on every thread to explain why those reorgs are healthy. That's funny
Nikamoto
replied 1857d
Mrpumperitis
I think it is. If they are only ~8miners you can't double spend even if the chain split. And if it's fine from the user perspective .. But I agree it's really weird, but interesting !
Nikamoto
replied 1857d
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
😂😂😂😂
Nikamoto
replied 1857d
Answers from the thread :
"No transactions has been lost"
"I was splitting coins while this happened. All still worked just fine from the end user's perspective"
It's ok, don't worry
Nikamoto
1858d

"It's a feature. Not a bug"
"No transactions has been lost"
"I was splitting coins while this happened. All still worked just fine from the end user's perspective"
Nikamoto
replied 1858d
I think bch should focus on p2p cash and let BSV do these things. But that's cool !
Nikamoto
replied 1858d
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
For LiquidBTC that is correct. You have to trust they (the 23 (I think) exchanges responsible of Liquid) won't scam you. It isn't correct for LN because the cryptography can't scam you
Nikamoto
replied 1858d
Lightning BTC are real BTC. Liquid BTC aren't. The whole point of Liquid is what you said. It isn't true for the LN
I'm paid to be an sv shill, not to be anti btc
Nikamoto
replied 1858d
Lowering the cap isn't that dump I think but even if they propose an increase of the 21 limit it won't be accepted I think (and they would have to hard fork maybe)
Nikamoto
replied 1859d
What do you mean ? You can't add inflation on LN because it's linked to the main chain and everyone has the whole blockchain to verify that
Nikamoto
replied 1859d
For eth, is it only the eth moved or also the tokens/DApps ?
Nikamoto
replied 1859d
Answering an "😂" is not the same thing as adding the "😂" reaction. But yeah you can implement it without changing the protocol
Nikamoto
replied 1860d
This is protocol change and not just an UX change. I don't think memo should change it's protocol too often
Nikamoto
replied 1860d
TrashPosterInTheDark
Dash is now ahead !
Nikamoto
replied 1860d
Mrpumperitis
Yep maybe you're right. The blockchain will remember
Nikamoto
1860d
SV is dropping hard. Behind Monero, thx binance&faketoshi \o/
Nikamoto
replied 1860d
That's interesting. We'll see how much power exchanges have
Nikamoto
replied 1861d
Damn
Nikamoto
replied 1862d
Bull run market + you could get a lot of money holding bitconnect coins with their ponzi scheme + lot of marketing
Nikamoto
1862d
Ok memo. If SV is a scam/shit project, then why is it worth so much ? It has a bigger market cap than Monero
If it was a fork scam it would be like bitcoin gold