to re-download those 28mb because you already have that information in your mempool. With graphene you just send some information about what TXs are included in those 28mb. So you only
receive a packet of 0.5mb with Graphene. Do you see what I mean? In the end the blocksize ( written to HDD) will be 28mb, the TXs will have paid whatever fees they wanted, but this is
If you have a node with 30mb of TXs ( all of them different Size, paying different fees and whatnot) and you get a new block that is 28mb in size, Graphene help your node by not having
to re-download those 28mb because you already have that information in your mempool. With graphene you just send some information about what TXs are included in those 28mb. So you only
(using it's own mempool) recreated the block that was sent using Graphene. It is important for you to understand that this has nothing to do with Fees, Blocksize or LN.
If you have a node with 30mb of TXs ( all of them different Size, paying different fees and whatnot) and you get a new block that is 28mb in size, Graphene help your node by not having
using the mempool your node already has. Because active nodes have a similar mempool, you just get the block header and some Graphene Information related to the TXs. Then your node
(using it's own mempool) recreated the block that was sent using Graphene. It is important for you to understand that this has nothing to do with Fees, Blocksize or LN.
The chart you are talking about is talking about the information that the nodes send between each other. The idea is that you don;t have to dwl 100% of a new block.You just recreate it
using the mempool your node already has. Because active nodes have a similar mempool, you just get the block header and some Graphene Information related to the TXs. Then your node
that their node already has. The size of the block is the same, the size of TXs is the same, nothing changes on that front. What changes is the way your node receives the block.
The chart you are talking about is talking about the information that the nodes send between each other. The idea is that you don;t have to dwl 100% of a new block.You just recreate it
the full block. Nodes with Graphene activated don;t need to receive the full block. They just get the header and a couple other things and recreate the block using the mempool
that their node already has. The size of the block is the same, the size of TXs is the same, nothing changes on that front. What changes is the way your node receives the block.
to propagate blocks to other nodes. The idea is that most active nodes have mostly the same TXs in their mempool. With Graphene, when you receive a block, you don;t need to download
the full block. Nodes with Graphene activated don;t need to receive the full block. They just get the header and a couple other things and recreate the block using the mempool
I think you don;t understand what Graphene is used for. It has nothing to do with Fees or blockspace. Fees and Blocks will be the same. What Graphene does is make it faster for miners
to propagate blocks to other nodes. The idea is that most active nodes have mostly the same TXs in their mempool. With Graphene, when you receive a block, you don;t need to download
If you look at Figure 4 from page 7, you'll see a chart that shows there is more space per node for transaction data.
I think you don;t understand what Graphene is used for. It has nothing to do with Fees or blockspace. Fees and Blocks will be the same. What Graphene does is make it faster for miners
This pretty much sums up LN. We should be going forward with Bitcoin the technology, but LN is going back to Fractional Reserve Banking and trusting Banks (large hubs) with your money
Whomever created this topic doesn't understand that Graphene and LN are 2 different technologies. It's like comparing apples and oranges. Nothing to do with each other.
And.....we're SOLD OUT! Super excited to meet eve..
http://redd.it/8yjh3d
Can;t wait to see all the attendees :D BCH and the people surrounding it are growing up at an extremely fast rate. Couldn't be prouder for BCH movement :D
I'm still waiting for evidence. But as this usually goes, FUD and no evidence. Kind of hard to feel bad for the guy when he just complains and doesn't show anything of interest...
r/btc has open mod logs. I waiting for this guy to show us evidence of the open mod logs. If he's telling the truth there will be evidence. But I highly doubt we will get evidence
Can you link to this? Was it on r/btc? BCH is under constant attack, so its supporters are on edge and can be quick to react.
I'm still waiting for evidence. But as this usually goes, FUD and no evidence. Kind of hard to feel bad for the guy when he just complains and doesn't show anything of interest...
Welp, got banned from r/BTC for objecting to Roger Ver's blatant vote manipulation following an offhanded negative comment against his undisclosed conflict of interest with purse.io
They deleted the thread. Scum.
"somewhere today a project is failing
BTC BCH have a lot to learn from the internet, and they're not very intuitive"
watching @Falkvinge
&t=597s
I like Rick. I felt like I was taking crazy pills before I found his channel. Good to know other people are analyzing what's going on and realizing something went wrong somewhere