OMG... paraphrasing has nothing to do with shortening. It's the meaning dude. "I am small and can't compete, big guys bad, big guys centraliseeeed!!"
LOL, yeah I'm sure that's what you meant. I didn't say it did, I said "'node' is even shorter than 'miner'". I'm saying it's way easier to say it correctly, if you know the facts
No, that would be you. One example, Coingeek had around 1.000PH for 6 months and before fork they brought another 1.000PH, right now they use 250PH on BSV.
Let me help you understand lol -
https://www.miningrigrentals.com/They rented that hash for the week preceding the fork to get idiots/BTC flooding into SV, sorry you got scammed pal
Point still stands: "If you really cared about miners then you would be on BTC."
It must be hard to live with that much cognitive dissonance.
He's just spinning, he's been trying to come up with excuses all morning for SV not being the golden god that they're trying to paint it as
LOL that's not paraphrasing at all, "node" is even shorter than "miner" jackass. Please keep talking, you're doing an excellent job of discrediting yourself for me
"It's easy because of the pixels" lol. You're spouting bullshit mate, admit it.
They can't even put together enough hash to get over BCH's meager rate, he's full of shit
LOL you mean "let me run my small node Core"? You can't even get your basic points straight! Too fucking funny. Calvin props up SV all alone, hopefully people get out before exit scam
Link sources if you're going to make bullshit claims like that, or I can just keep mocking you for buying into his obvious bullshit lol
I run a datacenter myself you jackass lol. You think that BCH only had centralized support? Part of the reason people broke away from Core was *because* it was too centralized
Poolin has been mining BSV for weeks now also based on your link.
I'm talking about nodes lol, there's only one implementation for SV, and Coingeek likely controls most of them.
It's easy for Coingeek to point their miners at different pools too
Lots of people are mining undercover, it's mostly on SV though
https://coin.dance/BSV doesn't have enough supporters to make a dent in other crypto's hashrates, and Calvin's low on $
You just gave me purpose. I might keep them now. 🤪
Keep trolling if you insist, you're just adding activity to our side of Memo and showing everyone how stupid you are lol. Plus I'm getting tons of likes for correcting you :D
You sound like core 2.0. It's just 2017 all over again.
You've said that like 3 times in the past day, how is this anything like 2017? It wasn't one guy who wanted S2X. Calvin is Core in this situation, trying to control Bitcoin to profit
I'd be happy to, just let me know how you want to do it
The ideologues made me move away from it as well though, if you strip away the scapegoats and bullshit marketing, CSW doesn't really have anything to sell. Plus that Centralized Calvin
I dumped a lot of mine when it first spiked after the fork, I anticipated that lots of BTC maximalists would buy it to troll BCH, and decided to profit off of them lol
I'll trade you BSV for your remaining BCH 1:1 if it means that you'll stop shitposting here, I'd happily make that investment to have you babbling on the loony blockchain you belong on
BTC, BCH and BTG are cancer on bitcoin
BTC and BTG might be, but BCH has a fair number of use cases and is way less centralized.
BSV is CP on bitcoin!
The best solution is to not take place in fights. Fighting with strangers over Internet solves nothing.
100%. It's important to try to counter disinformation however, and that's practically the primary use of the internet, Cunningham's law and all
You just said that BCH's roadmap was to "accept the Bitcoin protocol", are you saying that BCH accepts its own protocol if you aren't talking about BTC? Because that's a given, nutso
Any gamers on Memo? Which platform do you prefer?
| Steam |
4 votes
(4 unique)
· 0 satoshis
|
| Epic |
0 votes
(0 unique)
· 0 satoshis
|
| PS4 |
0 votes
(0 unique)
· 0 satoshis
|
| XB1 |
0 votes
(0 unique)
· 0 satoshis
|
| Switch |
0 votes
(0 unique)
· 0 satoshis
|
| Mobile |
0 votes
(0 unique)
· 0 satoshis
|
| Other (specity in comments) |
0 votes
(0 unique)
· 0 satoshis
|
Results
Creating...
Broadcasting...
This is so misleading it's a bit insane. Avalanche isn't a part of BTC protocol, and dependence upon LN for scaling is the issue, no one's opposed to second layers. Why do you lie?
...Unique miners? A single entity producing almost 50% of SV's hashrate does not a decentralized blockchain make. Could at least disguise it as a pool, but Coingeek is an embarrassment
So fucking pathetic....
Of course he doesn't want BCH getting any attention, Memo blows Twitter out of the water
Completely understand and agree. I only respect mining nodes. That’s why I made fun of adjusting the ABC “hobby” node. BSV is #1.
Lol the implication was that Calvin controls the grand majority of nodes. Of course it's easy to broadcast changes to SV, just call Centralized Calvin.
https://sv.coin.dance/nodes
